By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent development, Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie have requested a federal judge appoint a special master to compel the Justice Department to release all files related to Jeffrey Epstein, citing the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The representatives expressed concerns over the DOJ’s failure to meet the December 19th deadline for full disclosure and questioned the accuracy of the department’s self-reported figures. They also noted the absence of required reports detailing redactions and withheld records, hindering effective oversight. Khanna and Massie are requesting the independent monitor to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the document production.
Read the original article here
US congressmen are now demanding a federal judge appoint someone to take charge and force the Justice Department to release all the files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case.
This push is spearheaded by Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California and Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who are leveraging the Epstein Files Transparency Act to make their case. They’re basically saying, “Hey, release everything!” They are specifically asking US district judge Paul Engelmayer to step in.
The main bone of contention? The Justice Department’s perceived sluggishness in releasing the files, missing a deadline of December 19th of last year. Khanna and Massie are calling the Justice Department’s behavior a “flagrant violation” of the law and a source of serious trauma for survivors. Their letter underscores their lack of trust in the DOJ, essentially stating they believe the department can’t be trusted to properly handle the required disclosures.
The congressmen are raising serious concerns about the accuracy and transparency of the DOJ’s reported figures. They point out that only a tiny fraction of the documents – less than 1% – have been released, and they’re questioning the claim that over two million documents are still under review. Khanna and Massie express a “reasonable suspicion” that the DOJ is inflating the scope of the materials to delay disclosure.
Adding to their concerns, the congressmen note that the DOJ failed to provide reports detailing redactions and withheld records to the House and Senate judiciary committees within the required timeframe. They highlight that without these reports, it’s difficult to effectively oversee the process and conduct judicial review. The absence of such information creates a significant hurdle for anyone seeking to understand the full scope of the files and what is being hidden.
To address these issues, Khanna and Massie are requesting that Judge Engelmayer appoint an independent monitor. This person would have the authority to report to the court about the progress of document production and any potential misconduct. The congressmen strongly believe that an independent process is necessary to ensure the required records are actually produced and that the DOJ is not delaying or improperly redacting information.
It really feels like the public deserves full transparency at this point. Unredacted names and open documents. Let the consequences fall where they may, with a thought, if powerful individuals committed crimes, they shouldn’t be protected.
The situation raises questions about the government’s ability to enforce its own laws. It seems some believe that the current administration might simply ignore laws and court orders they don’t like, with little to no repercussions. The very foundations of our democracy depend on people doing the right thing, and there are worries that this is no longer the case. Courts have no power to actually enforce anything without help from the Justice Department. This calls for the need to release the files. It’s taking a long time, and the delay raises suspicions that something is being hidden.
The congressmen’s actions could be seen as a way of Congress saying, “We don’t trust you to police yourselves anymore,” which is a pretty serious statement. The focus is on finding a way to make sure the DOJ actually complies with the law and releases the information.
There’s a lot of talk about how the process needs to be handled by an independent third party to ensure fairness. By allowing the DOJ to release the files, they’re essentially putting the release in the hands of those who might be harmed by what’s revealed. It’s like putting a defendant in a criminal trial on his own jury.
Overall, the push for the release of the Epstein files is driven by a deep sense of distrust in the Justice Department. It’s a reminder that political parties need voters. The GOP is no exception. Those voters are people who have waited over ten years for full unredacted disclosure. This is what they’ve voted Trump in to do and they are prepared to dump him for someone who will get disclosure. The call for an independent monitor is a direct response to concerns about the DOJ’s actions and the potential for a cover-up.