A recent report alleges that China’s top general, Zhang Youxia, leaked sensitive information to the United States and accepted bribes for promotions within the military. Accusations include the transfer of core nuclear weapons data and facilitating the rise of Li Shangfu to defense minister in exchange for financial gain. The investigation is part of President Xi Jinping’s ongoing anti-corruption campaign, which has resulted in the removal or investigation of numerous senior officers and defense industry executives since 2023. This purge highlights Xi’s efforts to consolidate power within the People’s Liberation Army, potentially impacting its immediate readiness.

Read the original article here

China’s top general has been accused of leaking sensitive information to the United States and taking bribes for official acts, including promoting an officer to be defense minister – a story that immediately raises a lot of questions.

It’s natural to be skeptical when reading something like this. The idea of a high-ranking general, supposedly a close ally of Xi Jinping, secretly feeding nuclear weapons data to the US and undermining Communist unity feels… almost too convenient. If this were true, it would be a massive betrayal, and the ramifications would be enormous. But, the circumstances surrounding this story, the timing, and the sources, make you wonder if it’s all exactly as it seems.

It’s entirely possible that this situation is not about espionage at all, but about internal power struggles. Maybe the general was forming political cliques that didn’t align with Xi’s vision. That kind of behavior poses a direct threat to the stability of the state, especially in a country that is so conscious of its revolutionary origins. The CCP cannot afford for the populace to see any weakness, any cracks forming behind the curtain, so framing this as a case of a single greedy traitor selling secrets is a much more effective strategy than admitting there might be real problems in their ranks.

This kind of thing isn’t new. Double agents and corruption exist in every country with an espionage program. The way the CCP probably sees it, this is their version of the Russian “open window policy.” It might even be a deliberate leak, a way to test reactions and gauge where the loyalties truly lie. This could very well be a tactic to remove a political rival, given the infighting that is typical in authoritarian regimes.

The United States and China have a complex relationship. While tensions are high, the last thing either side needs is a war. But, the U.S. has a pretty good track record of being in wars that don’t lead to a global conflict, but it does highlight the ongoing rivalry and the delicate balance they both navigate.

Corruption, particularly within the Chinese military, is no secret. There have been previous instances of questionable practices, like the discovery of ICBMs filled with water instead of fuel. The fact that the general might have been taking bribes to promote officers, including to the position of defense minister, fits this pattern.

The main point is whether he was actually leaking nuclear secrets, or whether that accusation is being used as a pretext to get rid of him. Purges of military leaders and economic figures are commonplace in authoritarian regimes, especially when the goal is to consolidate power. And effective military leaders can be seen as a threat to a single-party state that wants their friends or relatives to stay in power long-term.

China’s actions in the South China Sea and its rhetoric around Taiwan are often cited as areas of concern, but in the grand scheme of things, China seems to be measuring success in the very long term and strategizing accordingly. They are very much aware of the demographic challenges ahead, including the rapidly aging population and low birth rates, which will have a profound impact on their future. In the next few decades, the biggest challenge for China may not be external threats, but the internal pressures of a changing society.