By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Prime Minister Mark Carney is scheduled to visit China from January 13 to 17, aiming to enhance engagement on trade, energy, agriculture, and international security. This marks the first such visit since 2017, following a period of strained relations due to the arrest of a Huawei executive and the subsequent detention of Canadian citizens. Despite previously labeling China a security threat, Carney has signaled intentions to deepen ties, having met with Chinese officials in recent months, suggesting a potential “turning point” in the relationship. While Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe welcomes the visit and hopes it addresses canola tariffs, others like Michael Kovrig have cautioned against prioritizing China for economic diversification, especially regarding tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.
Read the original article here
Mark Carney to visit China next week, first for a Canadian prime minister in nearly 10 years, and it’s certainly generating a buzz. After a decade, this trip signifies a significant shift in Canada’s foreign policy and is sparking a lot of debate. The main aim, as the Prime Minister’s Office states, is to boost cooperation in areas like trade, energy, agriculture, and international security.
It’s clear that many see this as a strategic move. With shifting global dynamics, particularly given the perceived challenges of the US’s recent foreign policy, this visit is viewed by some as an opportunity to forge new partnerships. Some are hoping for fresh trade agreements and a stronger relationship in the long run. Many are advocating that Canada should be building its own relationships independently.
The prospect of expanding trade with China is a driving factor, with discussions about getting “canola flowing” again and securing access to more affordable goods. Cheap electric vehicles (EVs) are a high priority, with Canadians wanting to get the BYD and other Chinese brands into the market. This reflects the practical needs of Canadians and aligns with climate goals.
Canada’s pursuit of more accessible and affordable EVs makes sense. China’s EVs are generally more competitive in price, and broader access to them could significantly speed up EV adoption across the country. Plus, developing stronger relationships with China could unlock beneficial exchanges in technology and improve supply chain stability.
Others are more cautious. Some express concern about the human rights record and political system of China and would prefer closer ties with the European Union instead. Some see this as a risky pivot toward a country that may not share Canada’s values. There are worries about the nature of the Chinese government and its potential impact.
The focus on strategic resources is also evident. Canada’s significant reserves of oil and strategic metals, along with its need for a stable supply chain, might explain why some perceive China as a potential partner in energy and security. The situation with the USA could also be a factor, with some indicating that the US isn’t focused on its allies.
Ultimately, the visit reflects the changing landscape of global trade and alliances. It signals a willingness to engage with China on various fronts, even amidst legitimate concerns. The outcomes will significantly influence Canada’s global standing and its economic health for years to come.