By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The speaker expressed optimism that the majority of Albertans will show their love for Canada and their desire to remain part of it. She believes that the concerns raised are primarily coming from a small group. Furthermore, the speaker suggests that the larger population will ultimately demonstrate their support for the country.
Read the original article here
Respect Canadian sovereignty, Carney tells US officials after they meet Alberta separatists – this statement, or one echoing its sentiment, is precisely what needed to be said. The situation, as it appears, is deeply concerning. Meeting with separatist groups from any province, especially when those groups are actively advocating for the dissolution of the country, is a breach of diplomatic protocol and a blatant disrespect for Canada’s sovereignty. The implications of such meetings are serious and warrant a firm response.
The fact that these meetings reportedly occurred and, even more concerningly, were seemingly entertained by US officials, raises significant questions. The language used by some regarding the potential separation and their perceived closeness to the United States only underscores the gravity of the situation. To go to a foreign nation and ask for assistance in breaking up Canada is, by definition, an act of treason. The Canadian Criminal Code is clear on this matter, and those involved should be held accountable under the law.
The Canadian Criminal Code outlines a detailed definition of treason, which includes assisting an enemy at war with Canada, or conspiring to commit high treason, or forming an intention to do anything that is high treason. The actions of these separatists, if they can be proven to be conspiring with a foreign power to undermine the country, could be construed as such. It’s imperative that authorities investigate thoroughly and, if warranted, prosecute those involved to the fullest extent of the law.
The motivations of the US officials involved, whether driven by political maneuvering, strategic interest, or simple misjudgment, are irrelevant. The principle remains: interfering in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation is unacceptable. Canada and the United States share a long history and close relationship, but that relationship must be based on mutual respect and adherence to international norms. Any actions that undermine that foundation are detrimental to both countries.
The argument that these separatists could simply move to the United States if they so desire is not only an oversimplification, but it also misses the point entirely. The issue isn’t about personal preference; it’s about national sovereignty and the integrity of Canada as a unified nation. Allowing such actions to go unchecked would set a dangerous precedent, encouraging others to challenge Canadian unity. This is something that must be avoided at all costs.
The use of the term “treason” by British Columbia Premier David Eby is appropriate and needs to be repeated. If these individuals are actively seeking to undermine Canada’s existence by soliciting the aid of a foreign power, they are committing treason. There can be no room for ambiguity on this matter. The response must be swift, decisive, and unwavering. The separatists are assisting an openly hostile actor achieve its publicly stated aims to weaken and destroy Canadian sovereignty. These “Canadians” need to be arrested and charged with treason.
Canada should also make it abundantly clear to the United States that it expects its sovereignty to be respected. Such a communication must be delivered with a tone of firmness and clarity. The US needs to understand that any interference in Canada’s internal affairs, whether intentional or not, will not be tolerated. This includes meetings with separatist groups and any other actions that could be construed as support for the breakup of Canada.
The parallels being drawn with Russia’s tactics in Ukraine and other regions are deeply disturbing. The notion of foreign powers attempting to destabilize a nation through support for separatist movements is a familiar one, and it’s a playbook Canada must be prepared to counter. The potential for external actors to exploit internal divisions is a risk that must be taken seriously. This should send a chill down the spine of every Canadian.
The situation is a clear call for investigation, prosecution, and a reaffirmation of national unity. It is imperative that Canada send a clear message. The Canadian government must act decisively. They must publicly identify those involved, present the evidence of their actions, and bring charges of treason where appropriate. Any hesitation or inaction will only embolden those who seek to undermine Canada’s sovereignty.
The historical precedent of Quebec’s independence movement is a useful reminder that Canada has faced similar challenges before. Canada has weathered such storms in the past, and it can do so again. However, the current situation is different, given the involvement of a foreign power. It demands a response that goes beyond past measures, one that clearly asserts Canada’s sovereignty and makes it clear that any attempt to undermine it will be met with the full force of the law.
The fact that the Trump administration engaged with the separatists is an indication of what might be in store. The current administration has to be held to the same standards. Any attempt to meddle in Canada’s internal affairs must be met with the same level of condemnation and action. The US State Department, even if it is not the Trump administration, should have responded to the separatists with a statement of the sort: “you are private citizens and have no authority to plan or negotiate for anything on behalf of Alberta or Canada. Sort out your internal affairs amongst yourselves before coming back.”
The response by Canada should be resolute, emphasizing the principle of non-interference in internal affairs. The conversation should be one about a shared future of mutual respect and cooperation, not division. The future of Canadian sovereignty depends on it.