By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During his first term, Donald Trump was presented with the idea of the United States purchasing Greenland, an idea originally proposed by Ronald Lauder, a longtime friend and businessman with interests in the region. Following Lauder’s suggestion, a White House team explored increasing US influence in Greenland. This renewed interest in Greenland has led to Lauder acquiring commercial holdings there. It is alleged that Lauder’s policy suggestions intersect with his business interests and that of a consortium.
Read the original article here
The Guardian: How a billionaire with interests in Greenland encouraged Trump to acquire the territory? It all began with a proposal, a rather unconventional one, that caught everyone’s attention. A forged letter, seemingly designed to influence Senator Tom Cotton, surfaced in 2019. Danish intelligence, swiftly investigating, determined the letter’s origins: Russia. This early deception sets the stage for a narrative of influence, ambition, and the lengths to which individuals will go for power and wealth.
The focus naturally falls on the global kleptocrats, those individuals who navigate the world’s power structures for personal gain. Ronald Lauder, a figure with well-documented connections to Vladimir Putin, emerges as a key player. Lauder’s involvement extends beyond mere associations; he’s been awarded contracts to mine lithium in Ukraine, a nation embroiled in its own geopolitical struggles, as part of a “minerals deal.” This participation speaks volumes about the priorities of these individuals. Their focus is on accumulating resources and exploiting opportunities, even amidst widespread conflict.
It’s clear that the appetite of these individuals is insatiable. In a world with resources and opportunities, they’ve positioned themselves to amass far more wealth than any individual could conceivably need, and their relentless pursuit of more is what drives the events. The very existence of billionaires comes into question. Many would say that this level of wealth accumulation is inherently problematic, contributing to the world’s challenges and the inequalities that plague it.
A critical point of focus is the role of British journalists and media outlets in uncovering and conveying these truths. There’s a call to support journalistic organizations like The Guardian, as they provide critical insights into power and corruption. The article underscores the need for these bold, intelligent voices to speak truth to power. This is especially true in an era of global neo-fascism. There’s a strong sentiment that sanctions against those involved are essential.
The core motivation behind the push for Greenland’s acquisition is, without a doubt, a strategic one. While the official justifications might focus on resources, the reality is far more intricate. It’s not necessarily about the frozen resources themselves, as these can often be found elsewhere for a lower cost. Instead, the strategic importance of Greenland’s location becomes the focal point.
The Arctic circle plays a central role in this strategy, especially within the context of Russian interests. The Arctic circle offers the shortest distance for shipping routes in Russia. Greenland becomes a critical piece of this strategic puzzle, especially since this would be the equivalent of the Cape Route for Russia. The Cape Route facilitates a vast amount of global shipping. Putin envisions the Arctic circle becoming a major shipping lane, a potential game changer for Russian trade and economic power. In this scenario, Greenland’s development becomes key, and Russia might prefer the United States to fund the development and open Greenland’s segment of the Arctic route.
Given Trump’s well-known susceptibility to influence, the idea of a billionaire pushing him to acquire Greenland fits a familiar pattern. This kind of arrangement is par for the course in the world of high-stakes politics and finance, and should come as no surprise. The narrative suggests that billionaires leverage their influence to steer policies in ways that benefit their own financial and strategic interests.
The article takes aim at greed, the insatiable desire for wealth, as a driving force behind the events. There’s a suggestion that income, savings, and assets need to be capped to curb the excesses of the wealthy. The narrative is that these individuals should be content with their accumulated wealth and enjoy their final years, rather than seeking more.
The suggestion that Trump’s interest in Greenland comes from a place of simple, uncritical acceptance is striking. The narrative hints at Trump’s general knowledge, stating that he does not know why, yet is now unwilling to let go.
The potential financial gains of the involved parties is the real driver for their Greenland plans. Acquiring Greenland might appear to offer access to valuable minerals, it’s not the primary motivator. The strategic significance of Greenland’s location within the Arctic shipping routes far outweighs the perceived value of any mineral resources.
The Estée Lauder brand is directly mentioned due to ties to Ronald Lauder. This highlights the widespread nature of the influence. The narrative suggests a coordinated effort to control resources and, by extension, global trade routes.
Ultimately, the article serves as an indictment of the billionaire class and their influence on global politics. It’s a call for increased scrutiny and action to curb their power and influence. The overarching message: the pursuit of wealth at any cost is a dangerous game, one that threatens the stability of the world.