By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Trump administration’s foreign policy actions in Venezuela, Minnesota, and Greenland have sparked controversy. Amidst these geopolitical tensions, the Catholic archbishop for the U.S. armed forces has stated that it is morally permissible for troops to refuse orders that conflict with their personal beliefs. This statement directly addresses the potential ethical dilemmas faced by military personnel during times of significant political and international uncertainty. The archbishop’s position offers moral guidance for soldiers who may be asked to carry out actions they deem ethically wrong.
Read the original article here
‘Morally acceptable’ for U.S. troops to disobey orders, the archbishop suggests, is a sentiment that cuts right to the heart of what it means to serve, and what it means to be a moral human being. The core idea here is straightforward: soldiers are not automatons. They are thinking, feeling individuals who are ultimately responsible for their own actions. Therefore, when faced with an order, especially one they believe to be illegal or morally reprehensible, they have a right—and in some cases, an obligation—to refuse.
This isn’t just about some abstract ethical concept; it’s also enshrined in law. The very oath that service members take includes a commitment to uphold the Constitution. The Constitution, in turn, is the supreme law of the land. It’s been said that they are legally obligated to disobey illegal orders. It really does make you think, why should the average soldier, the “little guy,” have to bear the brunt of potentially unlawful orders when it’s the leaders issuing them who should be held accountable? The call to remember their oath is a reminder of the duty to protect the country from all threats, both external and internal.
The implications are huge. The fear that troops would be ostracized or punished for following their conscience is a genuine concern, and a serious obstacle to anyone in the military. It’s one thing to say that disobeying is morally acceptable, quite another to face the consequences in the real world. This is where leadership and institutional support become crucial. It is important that the line soldiers know this. But officers and general staff have to make those hard decisions. Soldiers follow orders. It falls to leadership to interpret legal orders.
The idea that service members are being intentionally put in situations where it is difficult to determine the legality of their orders is a critical point. If service members are provided intentionally with misleading information, and a lack of support, then how can they possibly be expected to make informed decisions about legality? The administration that purged the JAG Corps (military lawyers) must know the impact this has. The notion of needing an archbishop to remind people of this is quite something, but the fact that the Church, historically a source of moral guidance, has spoken clearly on this issue is encouraging. However, it seems that there is a concern that this reminder is not reaching the right ears. Too bad the Church doesn’t have the influence it once had over Catholics.
It goes beyond mere acceptability; it’s a moral imperative. Disobeying an order to do something that is illegal or harmful to others is not just permissible, but necessary. It is the only thing that will stop this madness. Think about the gravity of the situation: imagine being ordered to take action against an ally or to start a nuclear war. The thought of that is terrifying. The stakes are as high as they possibly can get.
The concept has ignited some discussion about the idea of ‘morals in America.’ There is a real sense of worry that the values that once bound the country together are eroding. The question of whether there are no morals in America anymore seems to be on a lot of people’s minds. It appears that it is also a reminder that these are more than just orders; they are commands that, if unlawful, must be resisted. It’s a fundamental test of character and conscience, and this is why the discussion is so vital. It’s a reminder of what the military should be built upon: integrity, courage, and a dedication to something greater than oneself.