By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A nationwide shutdown is planned for Friday, January 30th, in response to federal agent actions in major cities, with organizers calling the tactics “tyranny.” The protest aims to address concerns regarding immigration enforcement tactics and the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens by federal agents in Minneapolis, specifically Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good. The “National Shutdown” campaign urges people to avoid work, school, and shopping, while also demanding an end to ICE operations. The Department of Homeland Security has stated that the agency is facing a surge in attacks and is conducting internal reviews of the recent shootings.
Read the original article here
Anti-ICE protesters call for a nationwide shutdown on January 30, and it’s certainly stirring up a lot of conversation. It seems the core message is clear: people are frustrated and want to take action against what they see as terrible abuses by ICE and the Trump administration. There’s a palpable sense of urgency, a feeling that “now or never” is upon us, and that something must be done to make a statement.
The idea of a nationwide shutdown, or a general strike, is being put forth as a way to send a powerful message. The focus isn’t just on stopping work, but also on curbing spending. The concept is simple: don’t buy anything on that day, and if possible, extend the boycott to corporations perceived as supportive of the administration’s policies. The aim is to hit them where it hurts – in their wallets – and force them to re-evaluate their actions. This approach extends beyond the one-day event, with suggestions that longer, more sustained actions are needed to truly effect change.
However, the plans for a January 30th shutdown are sparking a wave of mixed reactions. Some are wholeheartedly supportive, motivated by a sense of duty. They’re ready to participate, even if it means small sacrifices like packing their own lunches or foregoing shopping. They see this as a first step, a chance to unite and make their voices heard. Others are hesitant, pointing to the logistical challenges. Concerns include the short notice, the inability to participate due to essential caregiving responsibilities or pre-existing travel plans, and the potential impact on small businesses.
There’s a lot of criticism as well. Some doubt the effectiveness of a single-day shutdown, arguing that a longer duration is needed to make a real impact. Some are cynical about the feasibility, citing the perceived apathy or unwillingness of the American public to sacrifice their consumer habits. There are concerns around the potential impacts on those in essential roles and for those with pre-existing obligations.
Underlying the discussion is a deep well of anger and frustration. Many people express outrage at the Trump administration’s policies, particularly those related to immigration and the separation of families. They see ICE as a source of domestic terrorism and believe that the administration is driving a wedge between Americans. There’s a shared feeling of shame and embarrassment, a sense of being alienated from their own government.
The discussions also reflect a broader sentiment of international solidarity. Expressions of support and understanding from people in Europe offer encouragement, especially from those who feel isolated or maligned by the rest of the world. It’s a moment of reassurance and empathy, a reminder that they aren’t alone in their concerns.
The debate also touches on some fundamental questions about tactics and goals. Some view the protest as a call for completely open borders, while others see it as a fight against the erosion of rights and the dismantling of institutions. Some people think the best way to protest is a national protest while others are thinking of skipping work. Some people see this as a worthwhile attempt.
Finally, it’s worth noting the range of individual situations. Some are unable to participate because of work commitments, family responsibilities, or pre-existing medical conditions. Others are on medical leave or already have plans for that day. It highlights the diversity of the participants and the need for understanding and flexibility as they navigate their own roles.