By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Amazon is shuttering its branded brick-and-mortar grocery stores, including Amazon Fresh and Amazon Go locations, consolidating its physical retail strategy under the Whole Foods banner. This move, affecting around 70 stores across the United States, follows the company’s assessment that these locations didn’t deliver a unique customer experience or a viable economic model. Some stores will be converted into Whole Foods Markets, with plans for additional locations and the expansion of the smaller “Daily Shop” concept. Despite these closures, Amazon maintains a significant presence in the grocery market, a $150 billion business with over 150 million shoppers and continues to gain market share.
Read the original article here
Amazon is closing its Fresh and Go locations, a move that’s sparking a lot of discussion. It seems like the online retail giant, which once disrupted the brick-and-mortar world, is now retreating from its own physical retail ventures. It’s a bit ironic, isn’t it? The same company that put so many traditional stores out of business is now closing its own.
One recurring theme is the sheer wastefulness of it all. Many people report seeing Amazon Fresh locations built from the ground up, only to sit empty for years, or to be sold off to other supermarket chains. Businesses, lured by the promise of increased foot traffic from these stores, were left hanging, and some didn’t survive to see the store’s opening day. It’s a pattern that feels all too familiar.
The technology that Amazon touted, the “grab-and-go” convenience, also seems to have fallen short. The dream of automatically tracked purchases and cashier-less checkout didn’t always materialize. Many people say that the reality was far from seamless, with reports of employees constantly monitoring cameras to manually input orders and handle issues with the smart carts. The “convenience” often ended up creating delays and frustration.
Beyond the technological hiccups, there were also serious problems with the product offerings. Out-of-stock items, especially with staples like soft drinks and chips, were a common complaint. This, naturally, makes for a less-than-ideal shopping experience. Plus, there were reports of the stores feeling sterile and impersonal, lacking the warmth of a traditional grocery store.
Some people feel the stores had a deep issue with maintaining proper supplies. Customers frequently found shelves to be empty. It just didn’t seem to be a good customer experience, a problem compounded by what some believed was a generally poor selection of merchandise.
The impact goes beyond just the customer experience. Amazon’s approach has reportedly created a lot of uncertainty for businesses that set up shop near these stores. Seeing an Amazon Fresh location remain empty or suddenly close its doors disrupts the local business ecosystem and leaves the surrounding communities in a difficult situation.
And let’s not forget the logistical challenges. Amazon’s push for rapid delivery, even of perishable items, sometimes resulted in damaged goods and an overall decline in quality. For many, the delivery experience simply wasn’t worth the trouble.
It’s tempting to see this as a sign that Amazon is simply abandoning smaller stores in favor of a different approach. The plan to build a massive 229,000-square-foot store in a Chicago suburb suggests a shift towards larger retail spaces, perhaps a hybrid between a warehouse and a traditional supermarket. It seems like they’re focused on building something akin to a supercenter that will be able to supply much larger demand.
Interestingly, it appears Amazon is also shifting some Amazon Fresh products into Whole Foods stores, making use of the existing infrastructure. It makes sense, as a business move, but perhaps they haven’t learned from their past mistakes.
The smart shopping carts, meant to streamline the shopping experience, also seem to have been a source of frustration. Issues with scanning items and the scales frequently led to long waits at the cashier, negating the convenience factor.
Amazon’s venture into brick-and-mortar stores wasn’t just limited to grocery shopping. There was a clothing store concept that involved ordering clothes on a tablet and waiting for them to be retrieved from the back. These experimental ventures, coupled with the overall shopping experience, seem to have fallen short of expectations.
There’s a sense that Amazon is struggling to find the right formula for physical retail. The lack of inventory, inconsistent quality, and high prices have left many customers disillusioned. For some, the initial appeal of Amazon Fresh faded as discounts disappeared, and the value proposition eroded.
Many feel that Amazon is focused on dominating retail and delivering the convenience they’re known for. However, based on the reports, they aren’t concerned with the quality of the products or creating a positive experience for customers.
Some people feel that these moves are less about giving up on brick-and-mortar and more about consolidating their efforts into larger, more efficient spaces. They’re still learning and adapting, but the Fresh and Go experiment, for now, seems to be over.