By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite the challenges, the goal of achieving consensus on crucial issues like Supreme Court reform is not impossible. However, the article argues that the abolition of ICE must be included in the reconstruction agenda due to its concerning actions as a secret police force. ICE, with its expanded powers, poses a threat by potentially targeting and detaining individuals without proper oversight, representing a pre-made apparatus of control. The article also points out that Trump’s administration’s call for mass deportations aligns with the size of the country’s nonwhite population, raising concerns about the agency’s potential for abuse.
Read the original article here
Abolish ICE. This simple phrase, once considered a radical battle cry, is rapidly shedding its fringe status and becoming a mainstream demand. It’s time for moderate Democrats to acknowledge this shift and embrace the growing consensus. The United States existed for over two centuries without ICE, and there’s every indication it can thrive for centuries more after ICE is gone. The agency, created in the wake of 9/11, has morphed into something far removed from its initial purpose.
The current incarnation of ICE has become a source of fear and distrust, terrorizing families and operating with a seemingly lawless approach. Witnessing the agency’s actions, from the separation of families to the detention of citizens, has driven many to the conclusion that abolition is not just desirable, but necessary. Abolishing ICE doesn’t mean abandoning border security or immigration enforcement altogether. Instead, it’s about dismantling a broken system and rebuilding a more humane and effective approach. It is not about eliminating the function, it’s about eliminating the toxic bureaucracy that has corrupted it.
The calls for abolishing ICE aren’t coming from a vacuum. Polls indicate that a significant and growing number of Americans support this position. It’s no longer a viewpoint held only by the “far-left”; it’s an idea gaining traction across the political spectrum. This movement isn’t about anarchy; it’s about a more just society. It’s about ensuring that those enforcing immigration laws are held accountable and that human rights are protected.
Why is this shift happening? Because, over time, ICE has become associated with an overreach of power, a lack of accountability, and a disregard for human dignity. Its practices have alienated communities and eroded public trust. And the problems with ICE aren’t just about individual instances of misconduct. The agency’s structure, its training, and its culture have fostered an environment where abuses are more likely to occur. It’s a system that has to be dismantled to address its core problems.
Moderate Democrats must recognize that “abolish ICE” is not a fringe position. It’s a pragmatic one. In addition to a more humane approach, dismantling ICE can also streamline immigration enforcement. This includes refocusing resources, redirecting personnel, and establishing clear guidelines for fair and just practices. This would lead to better management and resource allocation. Embracing the call for abolishing ICE could actually serve as a platform for attracting moderates.
The hesitancy of moderate Democrats to embrace this position is rooted in concerns about alienating conservative voters. However, failing to take a stand on crucial issues can be just as damaging. Moderate Democrats cannot afford to cede ground to conservatives before the fight has even begun. A stance that is perceived as weak or out of touch with the concerns of ordinary people will not win over undecided voters.
This isn’t about being “extreme”; it’s about being on the right side of history. It is about acknowledging that the current system is broken and that reform is not enough. It’s about building a better immigration system for the future. As a moderate Democrat myself, I find people are frustrated and angry. We need an aggressive approach. The goal is not just to abolish ICE but also to hold those responsible for its abuses accountable.
In conclusion, the time for moderate Democrats to get on board with the demand to abolish ICE is now. It is no longer a fringe position, but a pragmatic one, aligned with the values of justice, fairness, and human dignity. By embracing this position, moderate Democrats can not only connect with a wide range of voters but also contribute to a more just and humane society. Moderate Democrats need to understand that the candidate who doesn’t say abolish ICE isn’t getting my vote. It’s an essential political and moral imperative.