Illinois Congresswoman Robin Kelly introduced articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, citing obstruction of Congress, violation of public trust, and self-dealing as grounds for removal. Over 70 House Democrats co-sponsored the articles, reflecting growing concern over Noem’s actions, particularly regarding the handling of recent incidents involving ICE agents. These incidents include the fatal shooting of a woman in Minneapolis and a shooting in Portland, which Democrats characterize as a pattern of abuse. The DHS responded to the articles by calling them “silly”.
Read the original article here
Over 70 House Democrats back Noem’s impeachment for her “reign of terror.” The fact that over 70 House Democrats have signed on to articles of impeachment against Governor Noem is a significant development, but the context surrounding it is crucial. The term “reign of terror,” historically loaded with meaning, is being used to describe the actions of the Noem administration, indicating a perception of widespread fear and authoritarian tendencies. It’s hard not to wonder what the other Democrats are waiting for.
The phrase “reign of terror” carries a potent historical weight. The term’s application, in this instance, suggests a belief that the governor’s actions are causing widespread harm and fear within the state, that every day brings a new level of terror. The sentiment is that she is taking orders from others, and therefore, removing her is the right first step. Some view this as part of a larger, ongoing struggle, connecting it to actions by other political figures as well.
This action, however, is being met with a degree of skepticism. The impeachment process is, for some, viewed with a sense of déjà vu. The impeachment is seen by some as potentially symbolic, and ineffectual given the current political climate. There’s a widespread feeling that the impeachment of Governor Noem, while perhaps justified, is unlikely to succeed without broader support, particularly from Republicans, who currently control the House and Senate. The focus here seems to be on a perceived lack of accountability and the potential for a revolving door of similarly minded individuals to replace her.
The process of impeachment itself is being scrutinized. It’s a reminder that it requires a simple majority in the House to impeach, but then a two-thirds vote in the Senate to convict and remove her from office. With a Republican-controlled Senate, conviction is considered highly improbable, and so some see this as a way for Democrats to appear as though they’re taking action while the situation remains unchanged. There’s a cynicism about the political theater of the process, a feeling that it might be a stalling tactic.
The broader political landscape is also very relevant. The perception of her actions extends beyond what may have caused the impeachment. Her policies and perceived allegiances are being closely watched. There’s a strong sentiment that her actions are part of a larger pattern, influenced by certain figures in the party. The removal of Governor Noem is seen by some as only a first step and not the end of the problem.
The focus then shifts to the potential consequences of impeachment. Some worry about who would replace her if she were removed. There’s a concern that the replacement would be just as bad, or even worse. The focus shifts to the cancer that is believed to be Stephen Miller, the potential orders that may have come from him, even if Noem is removed.
There is also frustration that this is simply the current state of politics. The sentiment is that this process of impeachment is only a first step in a long process, but nothing will ever change. The focus is then put on the greater need of the Democrats to stop fascism.
The debate further encompasses the potential effectiveness of the impeachment, and this raises questions about the definition of success. Will it lead to any substantive change? What needs to happen, and can it be successful. All of this, however, points to a larger problem that is being addressed.
