By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A growing number of House Democrats, now numbering one hundred, have co-sponsored articles of impeachment against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The articles of impeachment accuse Noem of obstructing Congress, violating public trust, and self-dealing, with specific examples cited for each charge. This support has increased significantly, fueled by criticism of Noem’s actions, particularly after the shooting of Renee Good. While the effort has gained momentum, it faces a significant hurdle due to Republican control of the House of Representatives.
Read the original article here
One Hundred Democrats Have Now Signed To Co-Sponsor Articles Of Impeachment Against Kristi Noem – and that’s the headline. But what does it really mean? A lot of the chatter around this seems to boil down to a simple, yet complex question: Is this going to matter? Because, let’s be honest, the number of signatures alone tells only a small part of the story.
The first thing most people seem to ask is, “How many Republicans?” Because, let’s be real, even with all the Democrats on board, impeachment isn’t going anywhere without Republican support. And that’s the reality check, right? Many people are already saying that the effort is essentially futile without the backing of the other side of the aisle. The sentiment is that it’s just “hand-wringing” and “time-wasting” without the necessary votes.
Some people feel frustrated with the pace of things. There’s a sense of urgency, a desire for decisive action. The feeling is, “Hurry the fuck up.” Why isn’t everyone signing on? There’s a lot of talk about spinelessness and being slow-walked. The general vibe is that 100 signatures might as well be zero if it doesn’t lead to actual change.
And then there’s the question of whether impeachment is even the right approach. Many people view Kristi Noem as more of a symptom than the disease. A lot of people are pointing out that she’s perhaps not the biggest problem, but that she is just a figurehead. The real power, the “evil masterminds,” according to some, lie elsewhere. Stephen Miller, Elon Musk, and others are mentioned as the “truly evil masterminds” behind it all. The underlying feeling is that removing Noem, while perhaps satisfying, won’t really change much in the grand scheme of things.
The political realities are also a big part of the discussion. People are saying that Republicans won’t sign on because their personal interests take precedence. There’s a feeling of disappointment in the political system, a sense that things are “meaningless” unless there’s a real willingness to cross party lines. It’s a sentiment of “us vs. them” and a frustration with a political landscape that seems to prioritize division. The point is being made that even if this were to happen, someone just as bad would replace her.
Others see this as potentially part of a larger plan. The concern is that this could be a distraction from other issues, such as the Epstein files. There’s a suspicion that this could be playing into a larger game, perhaps allowing someone else to be thrown “under the bus.”
There’s also a lot of talk about what could come after impeachment. Many people are worried that Democrats might increase ICE funding under the next Democratic president, and some question whether the Democrats are actually part of the problem. Some want action. Others feel that until something is actually done, and it’s not simply performative.
Overall, the reaction to the news that 100 Democrats have signed on to co-sponsor articles of impeachment against Kristi Noem seems to be a mix of frustration, skepticism, and a longing for actual change. The feeling is that it needs to be more than just a symbolic gesture. There’s a desire for real consequences, for a shift in power, and for a focus on the larger issues at hand.