A US judge denied the Associated Press’s request for immediate White House access reinstatement following a ban stemming from a dispute over the term “Gulf of America.” The Trump administration, citing the AP’s refusal to adopt the president’s executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico, maintains its decision to bar the agency from presidential events. The judge scheduled a further hearing for March 20th to address the AP’s claim that the ban violates First Amendment rights. The AP vows to continue its fight for press freedom, while the White House celebrated the initial ruling.
Read More
Rudy Giuliani has settled the $148 million defamation case brought against him by two Fulton County election workers, Ruby Freeman and Wandrea Moss. This significant legal battle stemmed from Giuliani’s false claims about election fraud during the 2020 presidential election, claims he made with unwavering conviction despite knowing their falsity. The settlement’s specifics remain somewhat unclear, sparking considerable speculation about the source of the funds used to satisfy the judgment. While some sources suggest Giuliani possessed sufficient assets, including property, to cover the settlement, others question how a man who once publicly claimed a lack of funds could suddenly meet such a substantial financial obligation.… Continue reading
This page uses Google AMP technology, meaning consent settings apply only here and may differ on non-AMP BBC sites. Essential data is stored on your device to enable page functionality; however, optional data collection allows for personalized ads outside the UK. Rejecting data collection prevents personalized ads but not all advertising. Settings can be adjusted at any time via the page footer.
Read More
The White House announced a restructuring of its press pool, granting the administration control over which outlets receive close-up presidential coverage, a departure from established tradition. This decision, framed as modernization and inclusivity by Press Secretary Leavitt, has raised significant First Amendment concerns due to the president’s selection of his own press corps. Critics argue this undermines press independence and the public’s right to unbiased information. The move follows a federal lawsuit by the Associated Press, challenging its exclusion from presidential events over a naming dispute, with a judge’s ruling pending.
Read More
A Maryland federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing sensitive personal data held by the Department of Education and Office of Personnel Management. The judge found that granting DOGE broad access to this information, including social security numbers and financial details, violated the Privacy Act of 1974. The lawsuit, filed by unions representing federal employees and student aid recipients, argued the access posed a significant identity theft risk. The court determined that while a “need-to-know” exception might exist, the government failed to justify DOGE’s sweeping access to millions of records for its stated purpose of auditing student loan programs. The order temporarily protects the plaintiffs’ data, pending further justification from the administration.
Read More
Seizing Russian assets, rather than merely freezing them, presents a powerful strategy to pressure Russia and support Ukraine. The current approach of freezing assets, while significant, leaves open the possibility of their eventual return. This uncertainty undermines the impact of sanctions and potentially emboldens Russia. A decisive move to seize and utilize these assets would send a clear message that the international community is serious about holding Russia accountable for its actions.
The argument for seizing assets is rooted in the notion of effective deterrence. Simply freezing assets may not be enough to change Russia’s calculus, as the potential for their recovery remains.… Continue reading
The 850th anniversary celebration of Glasgow’s burgh status excluded Pagan and Humanist representatives due to objections from Catholic and Church of Scotland leaders. Archbishop William Nolan and Rev Jan Mathieson threatened to withdraw unless the Pagan and Humanist speakers were removed. This exclusion sparked concern from Interfaith Glasgow and the Scottish Pagan Federation, highlighting a lack of inclusivity in the event held at Glasgow Cathedral. The Humanist Society of Scotland criticized the decision, pointing to past instances where humanists participated in high-profile religious events. Consequently, the incident has raised questions about interfaith dialogue and the appropriateness of holding such events in religious spaces.
Read More
State-sponsored North Korean hackers, likely the Lazarus Group, stole $1.5 billion in cryptocurrency from Bybit, exceeding all previous North Korean cybertheft and marking the largest cryptocurrency heist in history. This attack, achieved through sophisticated social engineering and technical skills, highlights the regime’s increasing reliance on cyber warfare to fund its failing economy and bolster its military capabilities. The stolen funds, laundered quickly through various exchanges, represent a significant portion of the global cryptocurrency theft in recent years and demonstrate the group’s advanced capabilities. The incident underscores the vulnerability of the largely unregulated cryptocurrency market to such attacks.
Read More
The United States voted against a UN resolution condemning Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, prioritizing a diplomatic approach aimed at bringing both sides to the negotiating table. Instead, the U.S. supported a separate, less condemnatory resolution calling for an end to the conflict. This decision reflects a broader U.S. strategy to soften its language regarding Russia, a shift coinciding with President Trump’s push for peace negotiations and criticisms of Ukraine. This strategy contrasts with resolutions passed by the UN General Assembly and supported by most EU nations.
Read More
Peter Navarro, a close advisor to President Trump, is advocating for Canada’s removal from the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. This action is intended to pressure Canada further, following Trump’s threats of annexation and the imposition of 25% tariffs. Trump’s stated desire to annex Canada is considered a serious concern, as evidenced by Prime Minister Trudeau’s leaked comments. The proposal’s acceptance by Trump remains uncertain, though it is under discussion within the administration. The Five Eyes network, a crucial intelligence-sharing alliance, would be significantly impacted by Canada’s expulsion.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood