Ukrainian forces captured two Chinese citizens fighting alongside Russian troops in eastern Ukraine, prompting President Zelenskyy to demand an explanation from Beijing. Zelenskyy alleges the presence of numerous additional Chinese citizens within Russian units and views China’s involvement, whether direct or indirect, as an indication of Russia’s intent to prolong the war. Military analyst Michael Clarke notes that the implications for China depend on whether the captured soldiers were acting as mercenaries or under official orders, with the latter representing a serious legal and political breach. Zelenskyy also confirmed Ukrainian operations within Russia’s Belgorod region, stating that the war should be fought on Russian soil.
Read More
Musk’s DOGE using AI to snoop on U.S. federal workers, sources say – that’s a pretty alarming headline, isn’t it? It paints a picture of widespread surveillance, utilizing advanced AI technology to monitor the communications of government employees. The alleged target isn’t just any communication; it’s specifically focused on identifying sentiments considered hostile towards a particular political figure and their agenda.
This isn’t your typical workplace monitoring aimed at ensuring productivity. The scale and intent here are vastly different. We’re talking about a potential chilling effect on free speech within a federal agency, a situation where employees might self-censor their thoughts and opinions for fear of repercussions.… Continue reading
US Vice President JD Vance’s statement that the US borrows money from “Chinese peasants” to purchase Chinese goods has drawn sharp criticism from China’s foreign ministry, who labeled the remark “ignorant and impolite.” This comment follows escalating trade tensions between the US and China, fueled by President Trump’s threat of additional tariffs on Chinese imports. China has vowed to resist these actions, which economists warn could severely disrupt global markets and trigger a recession. Vance’s statement also sparked outrage on Chinese social media.
Read More
The Trump White House cited my research to justify tariffs. They got it all wrong. It’s frustrating, to say the least, to see your work twisted to support policies that are fundamentally flawed. My research, which they selectively quoted, never intended to endorse the reckless application of tariffs without a comprehensive industrial policy. The administration’s approach was not just misguided, it was demonstrably incompetent.
Instead of employing a thoughtful strategy, the administration seemed to operate on gut feelings and a lack of understanding of basic economics. They treated tariffs as a silver bullet, ignoring the potential for unintended consequences and the complexities of international trade.… Continue reading
Justice Jackson issued a scathing dissent against the Supreme Court’s decision to utilize the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants. The ruling, made without oral arguments or briefs via the “shadow docket,” allows the deportation of migrants to a notoriously harsh prison based on unsubstantiated claims of gang affiliation. Jackson argues this sets a dangerous precedent, echoing the flawed Korematsu decision, and criticizes the lack of transparency and deliberation in the court’s emergency rulings. She contends the Court’s hasty decision, lacking proper review, demonstrates a troubling pattern of disregarding due process.
Read More
Brussels police arrested a member of US State Secretary Rubio’s security detail, a Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) agent, after an incident at a hotel bar. The agent’s behavior was described as erratic, escalating into anger when hotel staff refused his request to reopen the bar past its closing time. This incident highlights a concerning pattern of unprofessional conduct seemingly linked to the current US administration.
The agent’s actions, which reportedly involved becoming irate and possibly physical with staff, led to his arrest by local police. The details paint a picture of a highly entitled individual demanding special treatment, leveraging his position rather than adhering to local laws and regulations.… Continue reading
Ukrainian President Zelenskyy announced the capture of two Chinese citizens fighting alongside Russian forces in eastern Ukraine, claiming to possess information on more Chinese involvement. He has instructed his foreign minister to contact Beijing regarding this matter, which has not been independently verified. This development, along with prior allegations of Chinese military aid to Russia, casts doubt on China’s professed commitment to peace and raises concerns about the ongoing conflict’s trajectory. Zelenskyy called for a global response to Russia’s continued aggression, urging a reaction from world leaders seeking peace.
Read More
Home Depot co-founder Ken Langone, a major GOP donor, strongly criticized President Trump’s tariff policies, deeming them “bulls–t” and poorly advised. Langone specifically cited the 34 percent tariff on China and the 46 percent tariff on Vietnam as excessively aggressive and detrimental to negotiations. He questioned the flawed calculation methodology behind the tariffs, a sentiment echoed by other experts, including the economist whose work the administration cited. This criticism joins that of other prominent billionaires, indicating a growing concern among Trump loyalists regarding the economic impact of these trade measures.
Read More
During an Oval Office meeting on April 7, President Trump expressed displeasure with Russia’s intensified attacks in Ukraine, citing the widespread bombing as unacceptable. His comments follow a recent escalation of violence, including deadly strikes on civilian targets like Kryvyi Rih and Kyiv. Despite his previous mediation attempts and expressed anger toward Putin, Trump has yet to implement punitive measures against Russia, instead focusing on a new tariff regime that notably excludes Russia. This inaction occurs despite continued Russian aggression and violations of a partial ceasefire agreement.
Read More
A YouGov poll reveals widespread American disapproval of President Trump’s new tariff policy, with over half of respondents viewing it as the largest peacetime tax increase in U.S. history. The poll also indicates significant public agreement that the tariffs are negatively impacting the economy. While a minority supports the tariffs, believing they address unfair trade practices, the majority favor reducing or eliminating them. The substantial opposition suggests the policy may be politically damaging for Trump and the Republican Party.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood