2025

Trump Explores Deporting US Citizens: Impeachment Calls Mount

President Trump is exploring the legal feasibility of deporting U.S. citizens, primarily those convicted of serious crimes, to El Salvador. This initiative, while lacking clear legal basis, has been publicly discussed by the administration, with the President expressing enthusiasm for the idea. The plan faces significant legal challenges and raises concerns about due process violations. The administration’s previous deportation of immigrants to El Salvador, using the Alien Enemies Act, is already under legal scrutiny.

Read More

Elon Musk Rage Quits Livestream After Gamer Backlash

During a livestream showcasing Starlink’s in-flight WiFi, Elon Musk played Path of Exile 2 on a high difficulty setting, resulting in numerous deaths and significant online harassment. The stream, which lasted approximately an hour and a half, featured relentless cyberbullying from viewers using offensive usernames and hateful messages. Despite attempts by some viewers to offer support, the abuse overwhelmed the stream, culminating in Musk abruptly ending the broadcast due to a purported WiFi outage. The incident subsequently spread to YouTube following the deletion of Musk’s original X post.

Read More

Supreme Court Upholds Armed Worship at Niagara Falls Church

The Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari in the case challenging New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act (CCIA) leaves in place lower court injunctions blocking the law’s restrictions on carrying firearms in houses of worship. This is a victory for plaintiffs like Rev. Dr. Jimmie Hardaway Jr., who argued the ban infringed on Second Amendment rights and jeopardized congregational safety. While the broader challenge to the CCIA continues, the ruling allows armed congregants to continue carrying firearms in churches. Governor Hochul supports the state’s gun laws, while Second Amendment advocates vow to continue their legal fight.

Read More

Judge Orders White House to Grant AP Full Access to Trump

The White House must now allow the Associated Press full access, a judge has ruled, solidifying the principle of equal access for journalists within the government’s purview. This ruling correctly emphasizes that if the government chooses to open its doors to some members of the press, it cannot selectively shut those doors to others based on their perceived viewpoints. This is a fundamental aspect of the First Amendment’s protection of free speech and the press, ensuring an even playing field for disseminating information to the public.

However, the practical implications of this ruling are far from straightforward. The question arises: what are the exact requirements for inclusion in the White House press corps?… Continue reading

Mexico Warns US Against Cartel Drone Strikes: Act of War?

President Sheinbaum firmly rejected potential U.S. drone strikes targeting Mexican cartels, emphasizing Mexico’s non-subordinate stance and its commitment to collaboration, not interference. While agreeing to increased intelligence gathering flights, Sheinbaum underscored that unilateral military action would severely damage U.S.-Mexico relations and hinder cooperation on crucial issues like immigration and drug smuggling. Experts warn such strikes could provoke strong domestic backlash in Mexico, potentially leading to severed diplomatic ties. This opposition comes despite recent increased cooperation and Mexico’s own stepped-up efforts against cartels.

Read More

Musk and Trump Aide Clash in Bitter Public Feud

A public feud erupted between Elon Musk and Peter Navarro, President Trump’s trade advisor, after Musk criticized Navarro’s economic policies and used a derogatory slur online. This followed Trump’s decision to negotiate tariff levels with foreign leaders, contradicting Navarro and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s calls for a hardline approach. Musk’s attacks stemmed from Navarro’s criticism of Tesla and its use of foreign parts, while Navarro dismissed Musk as merely a “car person.” Despite both men initially downplaying the conflict, the escalating online exchange reflects a broader split within the Trump administration regarding trade policy.

Read More

Judge Reinstates AP Access to White House, Defying Administration

A federal judge ordered the White House to reinstate the Associated Press’s full access to presidential events, citing First Amendment violations. The judge ruled that the government cannot retaliate against the AP for its editorial decisions, specifically its refusal to adopt the President’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico. This preliminary injunction is a significant win for the AP amidst broader White House challenges to press freedom. While the ruling doesn’t guarantee the AP permanent access, it prevents discriminatory treatment based on viewpoint. The White House was given a week to respond or appeal.

Read More

Trump Admin Cuts UN Food Aid: Accidental or Intentional?

The State Department reversed erroneous funding cuts to the World Food Program’s emergency projects in 14 nations, admitting to mistakenly terminating contracts for vital aid. These cuts, impacting life-saving programs in conflict-ridden areas, followed broader Trump administration reductions to USAID contracts. While the specific countries haven’t been disclosed, the reversal came after the WFP publicly appealed against the cuts, warning of catastrophic consequences. The cuts were implemented by a top DOGE official tasked with dismantling USAID programs.

Read More

US Troop Withdrawal from Poland and Romania: A Betrayal of NATO Allies?

The Pentagon is considering withdrawing up to 10,000 US troops from Poland and Romania, reducing the current deployment of approximately 20,000. This potential drawdown, part of a broader shift towards focusing on China, has raised concerns among European allies about a diminished US commitment to European security. Such a move could embolden Russia and increase its regional influence. The proposal does not affect the smaller, rotational US troop deployments in the Baltic states.

Read More

IRS Chief Resigns Over Data Sharing with Immigration Officials

The news of the US IRS chief’s impending resignation over a controversial data-sharing agreement with immigration officials is sparking intense debate. This decision highlights a growing concern about the erosion of taxpayer privacy and the potential for the misuse of sensitive information. The situation underscores a fundamental conflict between the IRS’s core function of tax collection and the expanding role of government agencies in immigration enforcement.

This isn’t just a matter of bureaucratic maneuvering; it touches on the very heart of citizen trust in government. The expectation has always been that tax information, highly personal and sensitive data, would be used solely for tax-related purposes.… Continue reading