By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a recent online press briefing, President Zelenskyy reaffirmed Ukraine’s commitment to retaining all of its territory, citing legal, constitutional, and moral obligations. He emphasized that Ukraine is not considering relinquishing any land, despite Russia’s insistence on this point. Zelenskyy also noted ongoing U.S. efforts to find compromise solutions to the conflict. Furthermore, reports indicate disagreement on territorial matters within negotiations surrounding a potential “peace plan” proposed by the United States.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy: We have neither legal nor moral right to cede territory. Let’s delve into this complex situation, unpacking the core principle that guides Ukraine’s stance in this conflict. The fundamental idea is clear: Ukraine cannot, and should not, cede its territory to Russia. This position rests on both legal and moral grounds, forming the bedrock of their resistance.
Legally, the occupation of Ukrainian land by Russia is a violation of international law. To formally hand over territory would be to legitimize an act of aggression, rewarding the invader and setting a dangerous precedent for the world. Ukraine, as a sovereign nation, has the right to defend its borders and territorial integrity. To simply give up land would be to betray the very principles of international law, the rules of which should protect them.
But beyond the legal framework, there is a profound moral dimension. It’s hard to ignore the pain and suffering inflicted upon the Ukrainian people. Ceding territory would mean abandoning those living under occupation, potentially condemning them to a future of repression and hardship. It would be a betrayal of their rights, their freedoms, and their very identity. Ukraine has a responsibility to protect its citizens, and that includes defending their homes and their communities. This idea that an aggressor can simply waltz in, take what they want, and be rewarded with a formal handover is not only wrong, but it’s a direct threat to peace, security, and stability in the region.
Considering the realities on the ground, the situation is far from simple. Russia might aim to secure a long-term hold on occupied areas, effectively integrating them into their own sphere. This could involve rebuilding infrastructure, bolstering military presence, and slowly eroding Ukrainian identity within those territories. While Ukraine may not legally recognize such annexation, the practical reality of Russian control would be difficult to overcome. This highlights the dilemma Ukraine faces, where legal and moral principles clash with the harsh realities of war and the potential for a long-term loss of territory, despite never formally ceding it.
The question of how to move forward then becomes critical. There is the issue of dwindling international support. There are concerns of the influence of leaders like Trump, and how the tide might turn, and how it could undermine the ability of Ukraine to defend itself. This raises the stakes significantly. How do you fight alone? You don’t. But with international support waning, there is pressure to consider options that might seem less than ideal.
However, giving in and ceding territory is not the answer. Throughout European history, ceding territory to an aggressor has never resulted in lasting peace. It merely emboldens the aggressor, setting the stage for further encroachment and instability. The fight must continue, not only for Ukraine’s sake, but for the principle of resisting tyranny and defending the rule of law. A strong stance sends a clear message to the world about the values being defended.
The economic damage Russia has endured is substantial, and the long-term impact will be significant, irrespective of the war’s outcome. It’s a strategic defeat for Putin. Despite any gains made on the battlefield, the cost to Russia’s economy, its global standing, and its ability to project power will be felt for years, possibly decades, to come. Russia has already lost this war, in a strategic sense. The goal must be for Ukraine to emerge victorious, to restore its territorial integrity, and to secure a future of peace and prosperity.
Ultimately, this conflict is not just about land; it’s about values. It is a fight between democracy and autocracy, between freedom and oppression. Ukraine’s resolve to defend its territory, grounded in legal and moral principles, is the cornerstone of that fight. It is a stand that demands unwavering international support, and the recognition that the only acceptable outcome is a Ukraine that is free, sovereign, and whole.