By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The White House released a memo detailing President Trump’s “preventative” MRI conducted last month at Walter Reed Military Medical Center, weeks after the visit. The advanced imaging focused on cardiovascular and abdominal health, a standard procedure for men in his age group, according to the White House. The memo, issued by the physician to the president, Dr. Sean Barbabella, stated that the cardiovascular imaging was “perfectly normal” and that major organs appear “very healthy.” The release of information came after the president himself mentioned the MRI and amidst ongoing questions about its purpose, with the White House citing an “effort of transparency.”
Read the original article here
White House Admits Trump, 79, Got MRI Because of Extreme Age – now that’s a statement that really raises an eyebrow, doesn’t it? The core of the matter seems to be the White House’s explanation for why Donald Trump, at the age of 79, underwent an MRI. The reason given? Well, it was due to his “extreme age.” And, as you might imagine, that’s not exactly sitting well with everyone.
The idea that a person just gets an MRI simply because they’re nearing 80 is, let’s be honest, pretty unusual. It’s not like a routine check-up, like a blood test or a colonoscopy. An MRI is a serious piece of medical imaging, and most doctors wouldn’t order one without a specific reason, often to investigate a suspected problem or monitor a known risk. It’s not preventative. So, the question on many people’s minds seems to be: What were they actually looking for?
Many people are openly calling “bullshit,” pointing out that 79, while certainly advanced in years, isn’t so “extreme” that random MRIs become the norm. The age range where people are actually living very long and active lives is increasing. There’s a definite sense that something else is going on, and the official explanation is a flimsy attempt to hide it. The suspicion leans towards concerns about cognitive decline, perhaps looking for early signs of Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s, or even strokes. The fact that the White House isn’t being transparent about the reason only fuels these speculations.
Then there’s the practical side. If you’ve ever had an MRI, you know it’s not exactly a walk in the park. You have to stay incredibly still for a significant amount of time, usually confined in a small, noisy tube. And those machines are used to diagnose active problems or elevated risk patients. So, if an MRI was ordered, there was a reason.
The focus shifts to the fact that MRIs are, for all practical purposes, not preventative. While some screenings might be done for elevated risk patients, the implication is that an MRI suggests something is awry, or they are trying to monitor existing conditions. The White House’s phrasing – “extreme age” – seems more like a dodge, a way to deflect from a more serious underlying issue.
The “extreme age” explanation is also being contrasted with the fact that other people of the same age or older don’t necessarily need regular MRIs, or maybe none at all. The situation is being compared to Joe Biden, who, as president, was older than Trump is now, and seemingly did not require an MRI for the same reason. This creates a sense of dishonesty about the situation.
The frequency of the MRIs is also raising eyebrows. There’s mention of two MRIs, one in the summer and another in October. This adds to the feeling that something more is at play. The cumulative impression is that something is wrong, and they are not telling the whole story.
Some of the most critical voices are pointing out the potential for manipulation and the lack of transparency. If the situation is not handled honestly, this could be indicative of deeper issues.
The issue of medical imaging and Medicare also came into question. The suggestion is that Medicare might not simply pay for an MRI based on age alone. That leads some to question the validity of the excuse. The tone is clear that people think a real reason is not being given.
In conclusion, the situation is presented as a classic case of political misdirection and a possible lack of transparency. The idea that a 79-year-old simply requires an MRI due to “extreme age” doesn’t quite add up. The reaction is largely cynicism, fueled by the feeling that there is something more serious underlying the explanation. The overall impression is one of suspicion and a desire for more honest communication.