By John Q. Hosedrinker 
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt recently claimed that China stopped buying American soybeans during the Biden administration due to a lack of respect, but this was quickly debunked by evidence showing robust purchases during that time. This statement highlights Leavitt’s willingness to distort facts in service of the president’s political agenda, a pattern evident in other recent statements. Specifically, Leavitt inaccurately asserted the economy was improving despite clear indicators of rising costs, a contracting manufacturing sector, and poor job growth. When confronted with these realities, Leavitt deflected criticism by accusing reporters of pushing “untrue narratives” instead of addressing the facts.
Read the original article here
White House’s Leavitt keeps arguing with reporters. She berates them, not just for asking tough questions, but for daring to question the narrative. The sheer volume of misinformation she dispenses is frankly, staggering. It feels like a fundamental breakdown of what the presidency should be, morphing into something unrecognizable.
The entire White House, from the very top down, seems to grapple with the concept of reality. They operate in a rarefied atmosphere, disconnected from the daily struggles of ordinary people, surrounded by wealth, and seemingly oblivious to the world outside their bubble.
The situation calls to mind a simpler time, when press briefings were a rarity, if they happened at all. It’s hard not to long for the days of silence over the constant barrage of blatant untruths that have become commonplace.
Waging war against reality itself feels like a hallmark of totalitarian regimes. It’s a strategy designed to control information and ultimately, control the populace. It’s why there’s a certain worry about how easily Artificial Intelligence might be exploited for misinformation.
It’s been observed that it seems Leavitt’s role is to actively combat reality. This is likely why she was hired. There’s a certain belief, right or wrong, that an attractive woman might be better at convincing people of whatever is being said, even when the facts don’t quite line up.
When considering the upcoming State of the Union address, the scale of the task ahead of her, the work required to present a sanitized version of events, is almost unimaginable.
One can’t help but wish that reporters would come prepared with their own reality checks, ready to challenge the narrative with questions, such as “How does this align with America First?” It’s a question that demands an honest answer, one that rarely seems to be forthcoming.
As the administration continues to face economic headwinds, the path of “make-believe” seems to be the preferred course. This approach of simply inventing a reality to suit their purposes has been a constant from the beginning.
It’s hard not to recognize the historical precedents. Remember the inaugural crowd size? A seemingly trivial detail that was transformed into a symbol of the administration’s willingness to embrace falsehoods, reinforced by staff, regardless of the truth.
It would seem that for anyone with even a shred of conscience, the constant barrage of vitriolic misinformation must take a toll. And it shows. Her face reflects the strain of defending the indefensible, the constant need to deny the obvious.
There’s a sense that the press should step back, and no longer assist in the administration’s efforts to spread misinformation. Why help propagate these lies?
This is Trump’s strategy, the belief that a good offense is the best defense, and the constant cycle of misdirection. It works because the public has been reduced to a state of ignorance. It’s the “beef” being the point, the drama that distracts from the truth.
The only goal is to convince the faithful. Leavitt’s job is not to inform but to lie. To frame everything in the best possible light, no matter how distorted the image.
It’s a problem of decorum. There’s a fine line between the need to challenge the administration’s narrative and the need to maintain some semblance of order. Reporters need to hit back with proven facts, challenge the lies, and demand accountability.