By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The White House and Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson faced criticism for sharing a photo of Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, and Diana Ross with redacted minors from the Epstein files, falsely implying their involvement in Epstein’s crimes. The photo was a publicly available image from a fundraiser. Furthermore, after the release of the Epstein files, multiple outlets reported that dozens of images vanished from the documents without explanation, prompting accusations of selective information withholding from the Trump administration. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has faced backlash for allegedly removing photos of Trump from the files, although the Deputy Attorney General denied the allegation.
Read the original article here
White House Deputy Press Secretary Called Out For Falsifying Michael Jackson, Diana Ross Photos In Epstein Files
So, here’s the deal: it seems like a White House Deputy Press Secretary got caught red-handed, allegedly doctoring and inserting images into the Epstein files. Specifically, a photo featuring Michael Jackson, Diana Ross, and Bill Clinton was introduced, which is a major, massive, no-good, very bad move. The immediate reaction? People are calling foul, and with good reason. The sheer audacity of it all is staggering. Did they really think no one would notice?
The use of this particular photo is especially egregious. It was a publicly available image from a fundraiser, featuring Diana Ross’s son and Michael Jackson’s sons. The implication, as some are pointing out, is that the photo insinuated these individuals were somehow involved in Epstein’s alleged crimes, which is a completely false and defamatory narrative. This isn’t just a simple mistake; it’s a deliberate attempt to mislead and manipulate the public. The consensus appears to be that this wasn’t an “erroneous” insertion at all, but a calculated effort to smear individuals and potentially deflect from more pressing matters within the files.
The reaction has been swift and furious. People are expressing outrage and calling for legal action, with the estates of Michael Jackson and, especially given the photo and situation, Diana Ross and her family, potentially having grounds for a significant lawsuit. The idea is that it is blatant defamation, and this kind of behavior, particularly when dealing with federal documents, is deeply troubling. The integrity of the files is now in question, and the public’s trust in the Department of Justice is being eroded. The question is, if the White House is willing to manipulate evidence in this manner, what else are they hiding or altering?
The act has brought up many questions, and rightfully so. People are wondering how much of the information being released is trustworthy, what exactly is the Department of Justice doing, and what are the true implications of this decision. This action has led to a number of questions, including who authorized this, and what instructions were given to the individuals involved. The consensus is that heads should roll and there should be a proper investigation into the matter. It’s a blatant example of what many perceive as a deep level of corruption and a disregard for truth.
The implications of this extend far beyond just the photo itself. It suggests a desperate attempt to control the narrative and distract from potentially damaging information. It’s a political move, a strategic maneuver, designed to muddy the waters and discredit the entire investigation. The fear is that this could open the door to questioning the authenticity of other files, making it harder to determine truth from falsehood.
The outrage is palpable, and the calls for accountability are growing louder. The concern now is that this manipulation undermines the entire purpose of the files release and the quest for justice for the victims. There is the suggestion that this is a case of political sabotage, a calculated ploy to protect certain individuals, especially at the expense of others. There is also the potential that some individuals are willing to talk, possibly exposing the depth of these actions.
The comments also reflect a certain level of cynicism. People aren’t surprised by this behavior, given the political climate. They expect this sort of thing from this type of administration. This feeling, that things will continue to devolve and degrade, is a real concern. This situation also underscores a larger issue – the deep divisions within the country and the apparent willingness of some people to believe or ignore any action, regardless of its ethical or legal implications.
In conclusion, the situation regarding the White House Deputy Press Secretary’s alleged falsification of photos is a serious matter. The response has been very telling, highlighting the outrage and the demand for accountability. It’s a reminder of how easily trust can be broken, and how quickly the lines between truth and deception can blur. This isn’t just a political scandal; it’s a profound attack on the integrity of the legal and governmental processes. Now, everyone just has to wait and see what happens next.