By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Two gymnasts have filed lawsuits against USA Gymnastics, the U.S. Center for SafeSport, and others, alleging the organizations failed to protect them from sexual abuse by coach Sean Gardner despite repeated complaints about his behavior. The lawsuits claim the organizations were notified of Gardner’s “inappropriate and abusive behaviors,” including hugging and kissing girls, but failed to properly investigate, revoke his coaching credentials, or report him to law enforcement. Gardner was later able to secure a coaching position at Chow’s Gymnastics and Dance Institute in Iowa, where the gymnasts say they and other young girls were abused, despite additional complaints. The lawsuits seek damages for the abuse and negligence in responding to reports of Gardner’s misconduct, including detailed accounts of his alleged “grooming behavior.”
Read the original article here
USA Gymnastics and Olympic sports watchdog, it seems, utterly failed in its supposed mission to protect young athletes from sexual abuse, as alleged in numerous lawsuits. The underlying premise of these failures casts a long shadow, suggesting a system designed more for appearances than actual athlete safety. The creation of SafeSport, the very organization meant to be the savior, appears to have been a calculated move to placate sponsors and maintain a facade of action, rather than genuinely address the deep-seated issues of abuse within the sport. This paints a picture of systemic negligence, where the welfare of children, particularly young girls, was demonstrably not a top priority.
The implications of this failure are devastating. It’s not just about the immediate trauma of abuse. It’s about the potential for long-term psychological damage, even leading to tragic outcomes like suicide, or the complete destruction of an athlete’s future. The comments reflect personal experiences of trauma and the lasting impact abuse can have. It is also highlighted that SafeSport reports often result in the athlete leaving the sport, rather than the abuser facing consequences. This failure to protect leaves those vulnerable, those that are abused, feeling isolated and betrayed, and it only reinforces the cycle of abuse.
Furthermore, this failure raises serious questions about the role of governing bodies and their priorities. If an organization’s primary responsibility is to protect athletes, and they fail at this most crucial task, then the entire structure needs to be called into question. The focus should be on creating a safe environment, not just protecting the image of the sport, and a fundamental shift is needed to hold those accountable for these failures. The current lack of consequences for abusers allows them to simply move from one location to the next, continuing to prey on vulnerable children with apparent impunity.
The nature of gymnastics itself appears to contribute to the problem. Gymnastics, with its inherent emphasis on physical contact and close proximity between coaches and athletes, provides opportunities for abuse that are not as prevalent in sports with less physical touch, such as skateboarding or BMX. It is hard to teach the sport without touching the athletes. The very nature of the sport creates a slippery slope that allows for inappropriate behavior, with the potential for grooming and abuse. It’s difficult to separate the teaching of gymnastics from the potential for inappropriate touch, especially when the athletes are young and impressionable.
The reports also highlight how difficult it is to get any action taken, as the mandatory reporting system doesn’t always lead to positive outcomes. SafeSport seems more like a checkbox for mandatory reporters, rather than an effective mechanism for stopping abuse. The lack of consequences allows abusers to continue, and the fact that grooming behavior isn’t always considered a criminal offense further complicates the situation.
The article explores the intersection of this abuse with issues like transphobia, as the discussion includes the hypocrisy of those who are supposedly protecting women while simultaneously allowing abuse to occur. This perceived incongruity highlights the need for genuine protection of vulnerable groups. It appears the system is set up to fail.
The concerns about parental involvement also add another layer to the problem. The practice of limiting parental access to practices, or the lack thereof, reduces the ability of parents to monitor their children’s interactions with coaches. This lack of transparency and the revealing uniforms creates a dangerous situation where predators can exploit the system.
The question of why cases aren’t reported directly to law enforcement, and instead are funneled through SafeSport, is also raised. It is noted that, in the particular case, “grooming” is not necessarily a criminal offense, thus limiting the options for recourse. The lack of clear legal frameworks to address grooming behavior exacerbates the problem, and there is a critical need for an increase in legal protections, and an increased willingness to pursue charges against abusers to stop the cycle of abuse.
Ultimately, the article points to a fundamental need for change within USA Gymnastics and the Olympic sports system. The existing structures are not working, and the focus must shift to prioritize athlete safety over all other considerations. This must include transparent processes, stricter consequences for abusers, and a fundamental re-evaluation of how sports are structured to prevent the potential for abuse.