By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Under a new proposal, the United States may soon require tourists from dozens of countries, including the UK, to provide a five-year social media history as a condition of entry. This policy, proposed by the Department of Homeland Security, would affect those eligible for the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) program. The proposal also includes gathering phone numbers, email addresses, and more family information. Critics are concerned about potential harm to digital rights and longer wait times for ESTA approvals.
Read the original article here
US could ask tourists for five-year social media history before entry. Well, that’s a headline that’s bound to raise some eyebrows, isn’t it? It feels like something straight out of a dystopian novel, doesn’t it? The idea of handing over five years of your online life just to get a visa. Honestly, it’s a bit much, especially when you consider the potential consequences.
The first thing that pops into my head is, what does this even mean for those of us who aren’t glued to social media? Let’s say you’re like me, someone who doesn’t have a huge, public social media presence. Are you just expected to prove you don’t use Instagram, or Facebook? Can you borrow a friend’s handle, just to show something? I wonder how that would go down with the immigration officers. Imagine saying your Reddit handle is “OlympicAnalEater,” it’s not exactly the best look for a tourist. It’s funny, but it’s also a clear example of how complex and potentially problematic this policy could become.
Of course, the potential impact on tourism is a huge consideration, and for the U.S. that’s a big problem. Many comments mention the damage this could do to the tourism industry, and it’s easy to see why. The idea of combing through five years of someone’s online activity? That’s a huge ask, and it’s likely to put people off. This move has the potential to scare people away, and that’s not what the US needs right now, and the loss of revenue could be substantial, potentially costing billions. It’s a risk to the economy.
And it’s not just social media they’re after, apparently. They want your phone numbers and email addresses going back years, plus information about your family. It’s a pretty comprehensive information grab, and it makes you wonder about the purpose and the ethics of it all. It makes you feel like you’re being treated with suspicion before you’ve even set foot in the country. It’s hard to imagine anyone wanting to visit a country that demands that much personal information.
There’s also the question of free speech, or the lack thereof. If you’re someone who is vocal on social media, you might be worried about what you’ve said, and how it could be interpreted. It feels like a way to restrict speech. Some people feel the US is becoming less free. Even if you’re not trying to hide anything, it’s still an invasion of privacy, especially if you’re not in the same mindset as the people making the decisions.
The mechanics of this are also questionable. Who is going to be doing all this reviewing? How many people does this require? Is this going to dramatically slow down the already long lines at customs? The logistics are immense. Then what happens if they don’t like what they find? It raises the question of bias and inconsistency, and what criteria are being used.
The comments also bring up some valid concerns about safety. With all the other issues, there are legitimate fears of gun violence and other problems that are happening in the US. These kinds of things add to the factors that make the US a less attractive destination. The world is full of amazing places to visit, and a lot of them don’t require you to turn over your entire digital footprint.
It’s clear that many people have already made up their minds. There are plenty of comments saying, “No thanks,” and that they are canceling their plans. The US is facing a public relations problem, and this policy is not helping. The rest of the world has a wealth of choices about where to spend their time and money.
The reality is that this feels like another step towards a more restrictive and surveilled society. The timing is interesting, too. It’s not a brand new idea. It’s the kind of thing that makes you question the direction things are heading and the values the U.S. stands for.
There are many other things to consider. It’s a complicated issue, and there are many angles to examine. I can see why people are worried. It is a little “Black Mirrory” for comfort, and the pushback is understandable. It’s a significant change, and it’s something that deserves to be discussed and questioned. It’s a real indication of where this is going and what may happen.