By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to reports, former U.S. President Donald Trump claimed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had not yet read a U.S.-authored peace proposal aimed at ending the Russia-Ukraine war. Trump’s remarks came after U.S. and Ukrainian negotiators concluded talks on the proposal, with Trump suggesting Zelenskyy was delaying progress despite the proposal allegedly being favored by his own people and Russia. Simultaneously, the Kremlin welcomed the Trump administration’s new national security strategy, indicating alignment with Moscow’s vision for improving relations and potentially leading to constructive cooperation.
Read the original article here
Trump says Zelenskyy ‘isn’t ready’ yet to accept US-authored proposal to end Russia-Ukraine war, and that statement has sparked a whirlwind of reaction. The core issue seems to be the very nature of this “US-authored” proposal, with many questioning whose interests it truly serves. There’s a strong sentiment that the proposal isn’t genuinely American-originated, but rather reflects Russian demands and desires. The phrase “US-published” seems to resonate more accurately, hinting at the true authorship.
The skepticism extends to the potential terms of the deal. The underlying concern is that the proposal, as perceived, would have Ukraine giving up significant ground without receiving any meaningful concessions in return. The accusations of treason further fuel this sentiment, with some going so far as to draw comparisons to historical betrayals, and questioning Trump’s motivations and loyalties.
The fact that the proposed terms seem to align with Russian objectives is a red flag for many. There’s a clear understanding that if Russia agrees with the terms, there’s likely a problem with the negotiation. The suggestion that Marco Rubio called the original draft “Putin’s wish list” certainly doesn’t help in building confidence in the deal’s fairness. This reinforces the idea that the proposal favors Russia, further solidifying the perception of a surrender scenario.
Zelenskyy’s reluctance to accept the proposal is seen as a sign of strength and leadership, in contrast to the perceived weakness displayed by Trump. Many believe that the Ukrainian president is a strong leader, and that he will be remembered as one of the best. The focus then shifts to the consequences of accepting the proposal, with critics claiming it is a blueprint for Ukraine’s surrender, which would undermine the sacrifices made and the losses suffered during the war.
The implication that Trump is pushing for this deal for personal or political gain, potentially by currying favor with Putin, is a recurring theme. The concern isn’t just about the terms themselves, but about the underlying intentions and allegiances. It’s a deal that is seen as benefiting Trump and Putin while potentially leaving Ukraine with very little, and that’s viewed by many as a betrayal of Ukrainian sovereignty and a capitulation to aggression.
The idea that the US “authored” anything that benefits Russia is rejected by many who believe that Trump is enabling Putin. This is not seen as a good deal, as it is viewed as something that favors Russia. The war has been going on for a long time, and some believe that the only thing Trump is trying to do is surrender Ukraine to Putin.
The proposal has been compared to the situation in 1940 with Hitler, where the British were told to accept his peace terms. The claim that the US is authoring the peace deal is met with derision, with many suggesting it’s nothing more than a document of surrender. This echoes the sentiment that Trump’s actions during the initial White House meeting with Zelenskyy already revealed his true intentions.
There is a feeling that this is just another example of Trump’s weakness and favoritism toward Russia. Some individuals are skeptical and wonder whether it is true that the US is going to make Ukraine accept such terms. It is argued that what the deal asks for is Ukraine’s surrender, while at the same time putting the country at risk of further attacks.
The belief that Trump is a traitor to democracy is widespread. Some express that Ukraine should not accept this deal. What is wanted is for Russia to retreat to its borders and provide restitution. Ultimately, there is a strong sentiment that the proposal is not a genuine peace plan, but rather a surrender document disguised as a diplomatic effort.