By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Upon his return to office, President Trump initially proclaimed the immediate arrival of a “golden age” for America, a claim seemingly adjusted later to a timeline of six months to a year. Despite promises of rapid improvements in jobs and prices, the economy has faced challenges in 2025. Job growth has stalled, and unemployment has risen, while inflation remains persistent, contrasting with the president’s assertions of economic success. The administration has implemented significant tariff hikes, which economists warn could lead to higher prices for Americans.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump promised a new ‘golden age’ for the US economy. Where is it? It seems like a pretty straightforward question, doesn’t it? Yet, the answers, or rather, the lack of them, are telling. Trump, with his signature flair for grand pronouncements, painted a picture of economic prosperity the likes of which America had never seen. He spoke of booming growth, a revitalized workforce, and wealth cascading down to every corner of the nation. But as we look around, where is this fabled golden age?
Perhaps we should begin by acknowledging the obvious: most Americans haven’t experienced this promised boom. While specific metrics might paint a more nuanced picture, the everyday reality for many doesn’t reflect the glittering promises. The stock market might have seen gains, but that’s not necessarily the same thing as widespread economic prosperity. The disconnect is striking, and it leaves many wondering if the golden age was ever meant for them.
Now, let’s consider the nature of the promise itself. Was this golden age intended for all, or was it targeted at a specific segment of the population? Some argue that the “golden age” was always meant for a select few – the ultra-rich, Trump himself, and his inner circle. This perspective suggests that the policies and actions were designed to benefit those already at the top, leaving the rest of the country to watch from the sidelines.
The skepticism around the promise is strong, with many suggesting that it was never a sincere goal in the first place. The idea of a universally shared prosperity seems to have been more of a rhetorical flourish than a genuine aspiration. Some people view Trump’s economic vision as a means of enriching himself and his cronies, regardless of the consequences for the broader population. The phrase “golden age” might have been misconstrued as “gilded age,” where appearances of wealth and prosperity mask underlying inequalities and societal issues.
Let’s also not forget the role of trust, or the lack thereof. Trump has a history of making ambitious claims, and some would say that he has been prone to distorting facts and stretching the truth. Given this, it becomes easier to understand why people might approach his economic promises with a degree of skepticism. It’s hard to build confidence in a vision when the foundation is shaky, especially when the messenger has a long history of making promises he couldn’t or wouldn’t keep.
The focus on the ultra-rich is a significant factor in how many perceive the situation. When policies appear to primarily benefit the wealthy, it’s easy for the general population to feel left behind. This can lead to resentment and a sense of being exploited, undermining any sense of shared prosperity.
The perception is that the “golden age” is a euphemism. It is seen as a way to enrich the already rich. This viewpoint paints a stark picture of a society where resources are concentrated at the top while the rest of the population struggles.
If this promised era of economic well-being hasn’t materialized for most Americans, then it begs the question, where did it go? Did it simply vanish? Was it never truly real to begin with? It’s a complicated question, but the answers, or the lack of them, reveal much about the promises, the perception, and the reality. It appears the golden age was less about widespread prosperity and more about the enrichment of a select few.