By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite promising to end endless wars during his first campaign and second inaugural address, President Trump’s administration has engaged in multiple military strikes across various continents. These actions, including bombings in Africa, the Middle East, and South America, have led some supporters to question his commitment to avoiding foreign conflicts. Critics note a significant increase in U.S. airstrikes under Trump compared to his predecessor, particularly targeting ISIS and other perceived threats. This shift raises concerns about whether these interventions align with the “peace president” persona and previous pledges to prioritize American interests and an end to foreign military involvement.
Read the original article here
So, the big question is: Trump claims he’s the “president of peace,” but what’s with all the bombs? Reports from conflict monitors show the U.S. has been pretty busy dropping them around the globe this year, with well over 500 bombings recorded. That’s a lot of “peace” being delivered, right?
Honestly, the most straightforward answer seems to be: he’s a liar. A habitual liar, in fact, and it’s been a constant throughout his time in office. It’s almost a defining characteristic. This isn’t a matter of differing interpretations; it’s a fundamental disconnect between his words and his actions. He’s said one thing and done the opposite on countless occasions, and this is just another example.
Let’s look at the evidence. He’s bombed places. He’s threatened to bomb other places. He’s started trade wars. Actions like these don’t exactly scream “peacekeeper.” And the numbers back this up, with reports suggesting he authorized more bombings than some of his predecessors in similar time frames. His actions include bombing Syria, Yemen, and other nations, actions that are the antithesis of peace.
It’s also worth noting the specific phrasing he uses. Calling airstrikes “peace” sounds like a complete redefinition of the word. Less visible war doesn’t equate to less war. The whole idea feels like doublespeak, straight out of a dystopian novel, where “War is Peace” and lies are presented as truths.
Then there’s the question of motivation. Why would he do this? Well, there are a few schools of thought. Some suggest it’s a power play. Being seen as a strong leader, someone who can “get things done,” often involves demonstrating military might. The show of force is an easy way to appear powerful, and for those who see power through a violent lens, it can seem like an attractive strategy. It can all be a result of bad faith and immorality.
There’s another angle to consider: self-interest. Several of the places that have been subject to these actions share one thing: they are places with oil and mineral wealth. This pattern of “greed bombing” paints a picture of opportunism, exploiting situations for personal or national gain. This idea, combined with his own words, show how little value he places on peace.
And, of course, the ever-present issue of his base. They want to feel good, and that they support a President who is doing the “right” thing. But in reality, they voted for a leader promising “retribution” towards his opponents, but framed as him working towards peace.
It seems like, for him, it is the perception of control and power, and the adulation he receives from his followers, that are the true goals. It’s all about the performance. He knows what he needs to say to get what he wants.
Finally, there’s the simplest explanation, and the one that encompasses many of the above: he’s demented, his cognitive ability seems to be declining. He is the personification of the opposite of everything he claims to be.
So, when Trump says he’s a “president of peace,” the evidence overwhelmingly suggests the opposite is true.