By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump, who has accused political opponents of mortgage fraud for claiming multiple primary residences, appears to have done the same himself. In 1993, Trump obtained two mortgages for Florida properties, each stating they would be his primary residence, despite evidence suggesting he never lived in either. Contemporaneous reports and his real estate agent confirm the properties were rentals, a situation his administration has deemed fraudulent. Legal experts noted the irony, highlighting how Trump’s actions mirror those he has condemned, potentially exceeding the low bar his administration has set for mortgage fraud.
Read the original article here
Trump’s Own Mortgages Match His Description of Mortgage Fraud, Records Reveal, and honestly, it’s not exactly surprising, is it? It’s like finding out water is wet. The more we learn about the former president, the more this pattern seems to solidify: he often accuses others of the very things he himself is, or has been, accused of doing. It’s a classic case of projection, as many have observed. This isn’t just a political strategy; it appears to be a deeply ingrained personality trait.
When Trump rants about fraud, corruption, or illegal activities, it’s almost a guarantee that you can turn the mirror around and see a reflection of his own past. Records, it turns out, seem to bear this out. His own mortgage history, based on what the comments hint at, appears to echo the very kinds of fraudulent practices he has so vehemently condemned in others. If these records are indeed as damning as they’re suggested to be, it raises serious questions about the standards he holds himself to versus the ones he expects from everyone else.
It’s tempting to brush this off as just another news story, but the implications are far-reaching. If Trump’s actions consistently contradict his words, it undermines his credibility and calls into question the integrity of his statements. It gives the impression of someone who believes the rules don’t apply to him, someone who thinks they’re above reproach. It’s hard not to conclude that he operates under a different set of standards. This constant double standard is corrosive to public trust.
The concept of “projection” is frequently brought up here, and it’s a key observation. For those not familiar, projection is a psychological defense mechanism where someone attributes their own unacceptable thoughts or behaviors to others. So, when Trump makes accusations, he’s, in a way, revealing his own vulnerabilities and transgressions. It’s like he’s holding up a mirror, but only we, the audience, can see the reflection.
The idea that Trump’s actions are consistent with his own descriptions of mortgage fraud suggests a pattern of behavior. It’s not just a one-off instance; it’s a recurring theme. The comments suggest that Trump seems to have a history of engaging in the very activities he accuses others of, which is not exactly the hallmark of a law-abiding citizen. This is a point that many are making, and it’s difficult to ignore the pattern.
If Trump’s mortgage practices align with his descriptions of fraud, the seriousness of these revelations should be obvious. If someone else had done these things, as some of the comments imply, they’d be facing serious legal repercussions. That’s a fair point to make. It illustrates the idea of unequal application of the law, where the same actions receive different treatment depending on who committed them.
The question of why these revelations don’t seem to generate more significant consequences is also raised. It is a valid concern, and it’s certainly a common sentiment. The media’s response to these types of revelations, and the perceived lack of accountability, creates a sense of frustration. It gives the impression that there is a class of people who are essentially untouchable.
The suggestion that this is “investigative journalism” that has no impact is an incredibly cynical yet realistic point. The lack of accountability appears to be accepted as the norm. It’s a sad state of affairs when major revelations about a former president, like the ones suggested by the comments, seem to barely make a ripple. It’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that the legal and political system has either been unwilling or unable to properly hold him to account.
Another intriguing element touched upon is the relationship between Trump and figures like Jeffrey Epstein. The implication that Trump may have had some sort of knowledge or involvement with Epstein’s activities is a particularly disturbing one. The insinuation is that Trump might have been trying to stay ahead of an investigation related to Epstein, a connection that, if true, further complicates the narrative.
The comments also point out how Trump responds every single time. It’s a case of him shouting accusations at those who bring them up, and this seems to work. The comments point out that this is a predictable tactic that he has employed repeatedly. It’s the tactic of “deny and deflect.” Accusations are met with counter-accusations, distracting from the original issue.
In short, the emerging picture is of a person who appears to live by a different set of rules, whose actions often contradict his words, and who seems to consistently project his own flaws onto others. The fact that his mortgages might align with his own descriptions of fraud, based on the comments, is just another piece of the puzzle. It underscores the larger narrative of potential hypocrisy and the urgent need for a more thorough examination of these matters, and accountability. It’s time to open our eyes and see what’s really going on, which many believe is quite obvious.