By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a Christmas Day rant, Donald Trump targeted individuals connected to Jeffrey Epstein, accusing them of abandoning Epstein when the situation became unfavorable. He claimed these “sleazebags” would face scrutiny in the ongoing investigations. Trump also criticized The New York Times, suggesting their reporting on the Epstein files would harm their associates, and signed off with a foreboding holiday message. This follows previous online criticisms directed at political opponents. Furthermore, Trump has notably distanced himself from Epstein amidst the Justice Department’s handling of related files.
Read the original article here
“Sleazebags”: Trump Wishes A Merry Christmas To … Epstein Island Visitors?!? This is the question, isn’t it? It’s not just a rhetorical query; it’s the core of a very disturbing Christmas message. The former president, the psycho-in-chief, decided to celebrate the holiday season by sending greetings that were less “Season’s Greetings” and more “Season’s Accusations.” The target? People associated with Jeffrey Epstein, specifically those he labels as “sleazebags.”
The initial reaction is, well, shock. Then comes the analysis. The message is a tangled web of accusations, deflections, and thinly veiled threats. It’s like a linguistic Rorschach test, revealing more about the speaker than the intended recipients. He’s talking about people who “loved” Epstein, went to his island, and then “dropped him like a dog.” He’s describing a specific group of people, and the implication – or perhaps the inadvertent confession – is that he’s including himself in that demographic. It’s a masterful display of projection, turning the spotlight onto others to distract from his own involvement.
It’s impossible to ignore the accusations against him, especially when they’re so directly tied to the subject. The references to flight logs, alleged crimes, and the ever-present shadow of Epstein create an uncomfortable narrative. It’s a reminder of past associations and the unanswered questions that linger. This isn’t just a political jab; it’s a desperate attempt to rewrite history. And, to be clear, this is a tactic of distraction. This is a lot of noise. It’s a lot of accusations. It’s a lot of redirection. This is all designed to make people look away from the facts.
This all points to two key psychological maneuvers. First, there’s projection. By aggressively labeling others as “sleazebags,” he’s trying to shift the focus away from his own documented history with Epstein. It’s a blatant attempt to distance himself from his past and to deflect the social stigma associated with his connections. Second, it’s a tactic of deflection through “whataboutism.” By wishing a “Merry Christmas” to “Epstein Island Visitors,” he’s trying to broaden the blame, creating a false narrative where everyone is somehow complicit, thereby minimizing his own culpability.
The use of this message on Christmas is notable for its tone. This is not a man secure in his place in the world. This is not a man who feels in control. The rambling, the bitterness, the bizarre disconnect in his arguments – all paint a picture of someone unraveling.
The entire episode is a case study in denial, deflection, and projection. This isn’t just about politics; it’s about a man struggling to control a narrative that’s rapidly spiraling out of his grasp. The constant attacks on the “radical left” and the vague threats only add to the sense of desperation. It is truly the actions of a person who is not well and should be handled accordingly. It is time to apply pressure, to act in the best interests of the country and its people.