By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a Cabinet meeting, President Trump dismissed voters’ concerns about affordability, claiming it was a “Democrat scam” despite polls indicating that many Americans blame his policies for rising prices. He further asserted that these affordability concerns were fueled by “fake news,” despite previously campaigning on lowering costs. This stance contradicts a recent Yahoo/YouGov poll revealing that a significant portion of Americans believe Trump’s policies have raised prices. Democrats responded with criticism, accusing Trump of gaslighting Americans and highlighting the impact of his policies on working families.
Read the original article here
As Prices Soar, Trump Denounces ‘Affordability’ as ‘Democrat Scam’
The word “affordability,” according to the man himself, is nothing more than a “Democrat scam.” This proclamation, delivered amidst soaring prices and widespread economic anxieties, is a particularly audacious move. It’s a deflection, a dismissal, and, to many, a glaring indication of how out of touch some people are with the struggles of everyday Americans. It is as if the reality of rising grocery bills, gas prices, and housing costs simply doesn’t exist in his world. It’s a convenient narrative, allowing him to distance himself from any responsibility for the economic realities facing the country.
This isn’t just about denying a problem; it’s about twisting the narrative to his advantage. By labeling “affordability” a fabrication, he essentially declares that the very concept of people struggling to make ends meet is a hoax perpetrated by his political opponents. It’s a classic tactic: deny the existence of a problem and you don’t have to offer a solution. It’s a way to shift blame, evade accountability, and maintain a facade of control, even as the economic ground beneath people’s feet becomes increasingly unstable. The core is the same old song, and the record continues to scratch.
He continues with his familiar style of rhetoric. It’s the same style that, like a child recounting a movie, jumps from one disjointed idea to another, leaving out crucial details and logic. He rattles off claims about inflation being the “worst in history,” or that he’s the only one who knows the truth, and then moves on, creating a whirlwind of assertions that are often internally inconsistent and demonstrably false. The point isn’t to engage in a reasoned debate, but to overwhelm and confuse, while projecting an image of unwavering certainty.
The problem, of course, is that most of us experience the reality of rising prices every day. We fill our gas tanks, buy our groceries, and pay our utility bills. We see the impact of inflation in our wallets, and we feel the squeeze. To suggest that this experience is somehow a “scam” is insulting and dismissive of the genuine challenges people face. It’s an insult to people trying to stretch their paychecks. It’s an exercise in power to belittle any concerns that the American people may have.
This isn’t a new strategy. Throughout his career, he has employed similar tactics. He’s denied affairs, financial troubles, and the failings of his business ventures. He’s dismissed criticism, defied established norms, and attacked anyone who dares to question his authority. It’s a carefully cultivated persona of infallibility, built on a foundation of self-aggrandizement and a disdain for anything resembling facts. It’s the same old playbook. He continues to speak of things that are simply not true, because his base will believe anything he tells them.
The audacity of it all is stunning. The very people who promised to make things more affordable are now claiming that the very concept of affordability is a trick. It is the political equivalent of “let them eat cake,” a tone-deaf pronouncement from someone who appears to have little understanding of or empathy for the struggles of ordinary people. It’s a sad state of affairs where people will be happy to go hungry to remain racist.
The reality is that inflation is a complex issue, with causes that are both domestic and global. But whether it’s the result of supply chain disruptions, government spending, or other factors, the effects are clear: people are struggling. To deny the existence of this struggle, to label it a “scam,” is not just politically convenient; it’s morally bankrupt. The people who are making over $15 million a month in interest alone have absolutely no idea what regular people are going through.
It’s a strategy designed to deflect attention from his own past promises and any potential policy failures. He attempts to reframe the conversation, to portray himself as a victim of a “Democrat” plot. He’s not the problem, he suggests, but rather the solution. He uses these tactics to try to manipulate and control the narrative, which in reality is a failure, and he knows it. This is why he cannot win an election. This is why his party is dying.
This approach is likely to backfire. The more he denies reality, the more people will see through his facade. And the more he shows contempt for the very real economic pain felt by many, the more alienated voters will become. It’s a dangerous game, one that could lead to even greater political division and social unrest.