By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On Christmas night, Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, defending himself against accusations of ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump claimed he dropped Epstein before it was popular, while also calling out the “sleazebags” who associated with Epstein. Trump’s post criticized Democrats and alluded to the unreleased Epstein files, which contain names of individuals. The former president’s statement came despite past comments praising Epstein, with the DOJ still in the process of releasing Epstein-related documents, and the legal deadline already passed.
Read the original article here
Triggered Trump Takes Another Run at Distancing Himself From Epstein – “Enjoy what may be your very last Merry Christmas!” the president told the “losers” he predicts will go down when he finally releases the Epstein files. The situation, as it unfolds, has all the hallmarks of a man desperately trying to control the narrative, even as it spins wildly out of his grasp. The recent pronouncements, the holiday greetings that feel more like veiled threats, and the promises of “releasing the Epstein files,” all paint a picture of someone fighting to stay afloat in a sea of his own making. The irony, of course, is that he seems to be digging himself deeper with each attempt to distance himself from the scandal.
“Merry Christmas to all, including the many Sleazebags who loved Jeffrey Epstein.” This opening salvo is a masterclass in deflection. It’s a statement designed to shock and awe, a way of muddying the waters and making sure everyone’s attention is focused on the perceived “sleazebags” rather than the speaker’s own entanglement with the disgraced financier. It’s a way of saying, “Look over there!” even as all eyes are inevitably drawn back to him. The choice of words, the theatrical flourish, it’s all calculated to draw attention away from himself, and it’s a tactic we’ve seen him employ time and again.
“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” The man has a history of making statements like this. This quote, from years ago, is an encapsulation of the problem. It’s a casual, almost boastful acknowledgment of a relationship with a man now universally reviled. It’s the kind of comment that, in retrospect, looks incredibly reckless and insensitive, and it’s a gift to his critics and a headache for his supporters. It’s the kind of thing that makes it difficult to credibly deny any association.
The promise of releasing the Epstein files now takes on a new layer of absurdity. He’s been arguing against their release for a long time. Now, the files, which he previously dismissed, are somehow going to expose the “losers” and “sleazebags” and ultimately hurt those that he calls his enemies. This is the hallmark of someone who sees the world in terms of political combat, where the only goal is to win, regardless of the cost. The idea that these files, if they exist in the way he suggests, will be used for anything other than political advantage is naive at best. This is a game of optics, a bid to control the narrative, and it’s a gamble that might be his undoing.
The entire situation reeks of projection. Accusations, especially from someone like him, are often veiled confessions. The fact that he’s threatening to release information about others suggests he knows there are secrets that could damage him. The phrase “when he finally releases the Epstein files” is both a threat and a confession. It is a tacit acknowledgement of the potential for something damaging to come out. It’s the kind of statement that makes one wonder if he is trying to get ahead of a looming scandal, a sign that he knows his own house is built on a foundation of sand.
It is worth considering the context of the statements. They come at a time when he is under intense legal scrutiny, facing a multitude of investigations and potential indictments. It’s a sign of a man under pressure, lashing out, and trying to intimidate his opponents. It’s a tactic he has used throughout his career, and it might not work this time. The public’s patience is wearing thin. His base of support is shrinking. And the legal eagles are circling, and he seems to be saying, “I’m going to take everyone with me.”
The message he is putting out is a potent mix of bravado, threats, and self-pity. He is framing himself as the victim of a political witch hunt. But the more he talks, the less convincing his narrative becomes. His words are being scrutinized. His past actions are being re-examined. And the public is starting to see him for what he is: a man who is terrified of the consequences of his actions.
It’s clear that the Epstein case is one of those scandals that refuses to die, and his connections run deep. He’s trying to use the “files” as a distraction, a way of shifting blame. The problem is that the public is not buying it. The optics are terrible. It’s a sign of desperation, a last-ditch effort to control the narrative. This is not the behavior of an innocent man.
The timing of these pronouncements is also telling. It’s the holiday season, a time for reflection and goodwill. But his messages are anything but. He is choosing to engage in political combat, using the occasion to threaten his enemies. It’s a deliberate provocation, a way of reminding everyone that he is still a force to be reckoned with. The man is essentially threatening himself.
Ultimately, the entire performance is a sad spectacle. It’s a man who has always believed himself to be above the law, now facing the possibility of legal consequences. He is fighting to maintain control, but it’s a battle he may not be able to win. He knows what’s coming, and his desperate attempts to distance himself from the Epstein scandal are just a reminder of the ugly truth that is looming on the horizon. The man will likely have this last Christmas.