Contrary to Trump’s claims, the economy was strong under the Biden administration, marked by low unemployment, declining inflation, and rising wages. However, Trump’s policies, including tariffs, immigration restrictions, and research cuts, fueled inflation and labor shortages. Planned cuts to Medicaid, food assistance, and increased ACA premiums are set to strain public services, compounding the economic difficulties. Therefore, the current economic struggles can be attributed to Trump’s actions rather than the state of the economy he inherited.

Read the original article here

Trump’s biggest lie about the economy: ‘I inherited a mess’ is a narrative that, despite its frequency, simply doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. The reality is far more complex, and frankly, the facts paint a very different picture.

The truth is, when Trump took office, he inherited an economy that was steadily recovering from the 2008 financial crisis. Unemployment was falling, the stock market was doing well, and the general trend was upward. To claim he inherited a “mess” is a convenient distortion of the historical record, a tactic he’s employed repeatedly.

Instead of building upon the foundation laid by the previous administration, Trump enacted policies that, at best, had a mixed impact and, at worst, actively damaged the economic stability he inherited. These included tax cuts heavily favoring the wealthy, which contributed to the ballooning national debt, and disruptive trade policies that initiated trade wars and created uncertainty in the global market.

The consequences of these actions were not immediate, but they were inevitable. While the initial boost from tax cuts may have provided a short-term bump, the long-term effects were far more damaging. Tariffs, for example, raised costs for American consumers and businesses, contributing to inflationary pressures.

The narrative of “inherited mess” serves as a convenient shield against accountability. It allows Trump to deflect blame for any economic downturn or challenge by pointing fingers at those who came before him. This tactic is particularly effective with his base, who are often more interested in emotional narratives than objective reality.

The problem with this approach is that it undermines the credibility of the former president. It demonstrates a lack of willingness to take responsibility for his own actions and policies, especially in the realm of economic policy. It also shows a tendency to prioritize political expediency over sound economic principles, which in turn hurts the people.

The irony is that Trump has, in fact, repeatedly shown a pattern of economic mismanagement. He came into office, claimed that everything was fine and that he would make it better, made it worse.

The reality is that under Trump, the economy experienced periods of volatility, trade imbalances, and growing debt. The gains he touted were often offset by negative consequences, which eventually began to harm regular people.

The most damaging thing is the precedent that he set when he was in office. This is the idea that it’s perfectly acceptable for a leader to outright lie and fabricate narratives to suit their needs.

Biden, on the other hand, inherited an economy facing very real challenges, most notably the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. It would have been easy for him to resort to the same blame game that Trump had perfected. Instead, he took steps to mitigate the crisis and rebuild the economy. Under Biden’s leadership, the country saw a strong economic recovery. Unemployment fell to historic lows, and wages rose, especially for lower-income workers.

This stands in stark contrast to Trump’s claims that he inherited a mess. The truth is, Trump inherited an economy on the upswing. His actions, from trade wars to tax cuts, created problems that Biden had to tackle. The real “mess” that Trump created was his own economic mismanagement, which he now tries to cover up by continuing to tell lies and blaming others for his own shortcomings.