The Trump administration recently cancelled citizenship ceremonies for immigrants from 19 countries, including Iran, already subject to a travel ban. This decision left legal permanent residents like Sanam, who had completed all prior steps, in limbo. Affected individuals, such as Sanam and Jorge, were informed of the cancellations just days or even hours before their ceremonies. This action is part of broader efforts to tighten immigration rules, following a shooting in Washington D.C., leading to uncertainty and re-evaluation of their futures in the U.S.

Read the original article here

They were almost American – then Trump cancelled their citizenship ceremonies. It’s hard to wrap your head around the idea that someone could be so close, so meticulously following all the rules, and yet have the rug pulled out from under them. Imagine the relief, the anticipation of finally becoming a citizen, only to have it ripped away by a political maneuver. That’s precisely what happened to countless individuals when citizenship ceremonies were canceled under the Trump administration. It’s not just a matter of denying someone their legal right, it’s a deep betrayal of trust.

The legal immigration process is complex, often lengthy, and requires immense patience. People invest years, resources, and emotional energy into achieving their dream of becoming American citizens. They jump through hoops, provide documentation, undergo interviews, and wait. Then, after all that, to have the culmination of that effort – the citizenship ceremony – abruptly canceled is not only cruel but also undermines the very fabric of the legal system. The fact that some of these individuals were facing this hardship right before they were about to be sworn in is particularly heartbreaking.

It’s tempting to brush this off as a byproduct of political wrangling, but this feels like something deeper, a deliberate act of spite. The rhetoric surrounding immigration often frames it as a black and white issue, but this is a reminder that there are real people with real lives at stake. The cancellation of these ceremonies wasn’t just a policy change; it was a personal attack on their hopes and dreams. And it’s disheartening to hear people say things like “just do it legally” while simultaneously undermining the legitimacy of that very process.

It’s worth noting that the government has a time window to object to someone’s citizenship application, and if they don’t meet that deadline and the individual is still cleared, then a judge can swear the person in, which demonstrates that while there might be avenues for recourse, it adds an extra layer of difficulty to an already complex process. This adds to the frustration and injustice of the situation. It forces people to fight for what they are rightfully owed, a process that is exhausting, expensive, and emotionally draining.

The narrative often painted is that those who follow the rules have nothing to fear. But what happens when the rules themselves are being manipulated? When the very institutions designed to uphold the law are used to stymie and delay the process for their political gain? This highlights the hypocrisy of the “legal immigration” argument. It wasn’t about upholding the law, but about keeping certain people out. This hypocrisy makes this all the more infuriating.

The situation is further complicated by the fact that some of those affected by these canceled ceremonies may still vote for Trump. It’s a stark reminder of the power of propaganda and how easily people can be manipulated into supporting policies that harm them. It’s a frustrating paradox to see someone suffering from a policy and still believing in the person who enacted it. This underscores the need for a more honest and less divisive conversation around immigration.

Looking ahead, a future administration will need to take decisive action to rectify the wrongs of the past. It will take more than just reversing the policies; it will require a thorough reckoning and accountability. We need to acknowledge the damage done, provide reparations where necessary, and hold those responsible accountable for their actions. This will mean going after those who collaborated in these actions, and that can’t be done without a strong leader and a united front.

This isn’t just about immigration; it’s about the erosion of trust in institutions and the very notion of fairness and justice. If the law is only applied selectively, then it ceases to be law. If following the rules doesn’t guarantee protection, then the system is broken. That’s the core of what’s so disturbing about this situation, a sentiment of helplessness and betrayal. And it is important to remember that there are real people behind the numbers, people whose lives have been deeply impacted by these policies.