By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The U.S. military conducted Christmas Day strikes in Nigeria, reportedly targeting ISIS militants, with President Trump claiming to protect Christians facing unprecedented violence. However, this claim appears to be a political maneuver aimed at appealing to his evangelical base, rather than a genuine effort to reduce violence or advance U.S. national interests. While the Nigerian government acknowledged the attacks, there was no indication they requested them, and the focus on Christian victims overlooks the broader sectarian violence affecting various communities. The timing of the strikes and their effectiveness are questionable, and the U.S.’s actions seem inconsistent with its professed concern for persecuted Christians, given other policies.
Read the original article here
Trump sending bombs into Nigeria was a Christmas show for his evangelical base, and it’s a chilling thought. The idea that a military action, particularly one involving the potential killing of people, could be orchestrated on Christmas Day to cater to a specific segment of the population is deeply disturbing. It raises uncomfortable questions about the motives behind such actions and the values they supposedly represent. The incongruity between the message of Christmas, one of peace and goodwill, and the act of bombing is stark, highlighting the perceived hypocrisy.
The primary motivation seems to be the blatant pandering to the white Christian nationalist evangelical base, who seemingly were more interested in a show of force, and a demonstration of power, than anything to do with Christmas. This base seems readily amenable to violence, especially against those perceived as “other.” The narrative surrounding the attacks is easily manipulated, and they’re quick to blindly support their chosen leader, regardless of the ethical implications of the actions. It’s almost as if the very idea of “Christian love” is twisted into something unrecognizable, a justification for violence and hate.
The targeting of Nigeria, a country rich in oil, adds another layer of complexity. It suggests that the motives go beyond mere religious solidarity. The pursuit of resources, particularly oil, might have been a factor, wrapped in the rhetoric of protecting Christians. The contrast is sharp, between the professed concern for Christians and the potential for economic gain.
Furthermore, it is a tragedy that the narrative can easily be shaped. The claim of Christians being slaughtered is used as justification for the attacks, without any regard for the truth, or the lives that would be lost. This kind of propaganda works because the base is conditioned to blindly accept information that aligns with their prejudices. The lack of critical thinking is something that is deeply concerning, and it really shows the dangers of allowing narratives to control the masses.
The whole situation seems to mock the very core of Christianity. The Prince of Peace, turning into the bomb thrower on Christmas? It’s a complete inversion of values. You have the blatant hypocrisy of claiming to act in the name of Christianity while committing acts that run counter to its basic tenets. This exposes the dark underbelly of a certain type of religious belief, where power, control, and tribalism take precedence over compassion and empathy.
There’s a sense of disbelief and disgust at this. How can anyone look at this situation and not see the absurdity and the moral bankruptcy of it all? The fact that it’s not even front-page news is a sign of how desensitized we’ve become to such acts, and how complicit we are in allowing them to happen. The bombing of other people on Christmas, for a political show, is grotesque, and it’s a testament to the moral decay that has taken root.
The fact that the action is happening with what seems like a wink and a nod, with complete disregard for the victims, is absolutely appalling. This type of attitude reveals the darkness that lives in the hearts of some. The hypocrisy of people claiming to be Christians while supporting violence against others is mind-boggling. It underscores the corruption that can occur when religion is weaponized for political gain.
The whole thing is a carefully constructed show. It is designed to manipulate a specific group of people by appealing to their fears and prejudices. The aim isn’t genuine concern for any group of people. It’s all just political theater, and the fact that it is accepted is a devastating indictment of the state of our society. It’s a sad state of affairs when a Christmas bombing can be seen as an uplifting gift, and it really shows the lengths people will go to support their leader.
The idea that this is what Jesus would have wanted, that killing others in his name is somehow justified, is a gross misrepresentation of Christianity. The concept of loving your neighbor is twisted into something that is unrecognizable. The fact that the evangelical base cheers this on, proves that they do not have a true sense of the religion that they claim to follow.
The whole scenario is a twisted perversion of everything that Christmas, and Christianity, is meant to represent. The people that see this as “Christian” are those that are lost, and the fact that they can’t see the depravity in their own actions is terrifying. It’s a sign of a society that has lost its way, and it’s a warning of the dangers of blind faith and political opportunism.