By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Concerns regarding the former president’s health have persisted, fueled by observations of his physical state. Public perception has been shaped by reports of the former president’s inability to recall details and the appearance of odd discolorations. Furthermore, his behavior during critical meetings with world leaders has raised eyebrows, with incidents of appearing disoriented and instances of falling asleep during important public events, including meetings with foreign dignitaries and even the Pope’s funeral. These observations have contributed to ongoing questions about his well-being.
Read the original article here
Trump’s Mystery Bruise Spreads to His Other Hand – How will the White House explain this? The appearance of a bruise on Donald Trump’s hand, and then its appearance on the other, immediately sparks curiosity, concern, and, inevitably, speculation. How will the White House address this? Well, based on past behavior, the explanations are likely to range from the utterly absurd to the deliberately evasive, all while attempting to deflect scrutiny. We’ve seen it before: denial, misdirection, and a dismissive attitude towards any questioning.
First, let’s consider the possibilities. The most likely explanation for a bruise on the back of the hand, especially in a man of his age, is an IV injection site. Frequent infusions are common among the elderly, especially those dealing with health issues. These infusions, often administered in the veins on the back of the hand, can lead to bruising and skin discoloration. It’s a straightforward medical explanation. But, given the political landscape, it’s far from the only possible one we’re likely to hear.
Another possibility being discussed is that he’s on blood thinners, which can lead to increased bruising. Alternatively, he may be receiving medication through IVs for a variety of conditions, including potentially addressing symptoms of dementia. There are treatments, such as Leqembi, that require regular infusions. The use of a hand for infusions could also be due to the veins in the other hand being overused or difficult to access.
So, how will the White House likely frame this? They might initially dismiss it as “fake news,” as they have done in the past with any unflattering information. Then, if pressed, expect a narrative that’s designed to downplay any health concerns. A common tactic is to attribute it to something benign, like “shaking too many hands.” This would, of course, be a very convenient explanation, and it allows them to maintain a facade of strength and vitality. The administration might also try to deflect the issue by attacking the media, accusing them of obsessing over inconsequential details.
Another potential explanation, albeit one that seems unlikely given the administration’s track record, would be to simply acknowledge the medical reality. This would mean being transparent about the reason for the IV infusions, if that is indeed the case. While it would provide a clear and understandable explanation, it would require honesty, a commodity often in short supply when it comes to this administration. It would also open the door to questions about his health and ability to perform his duties, which is probably the main reason they wouldn’t want to go this route.
The public reaction to the White House’s explanation will likely be split, with supporters being more inclined to accept whatever narrative is offered. However, those skeptical of the administration will likely look for a more factual, medical explanation, and they will likely question the evasiveness or outright lies. The press is likely to probe further, seeking a more detailed account from medical professionals who are unaffiliated with the administration. They’ll need to know what this man is getting on a regular basis.
In all of this, it’s important to keep perspective. A bruise, by itself, is not an indication of anything beyond a physical trauma. But in the context of questions about his health and fitness for office, it becomes symbolic of a lack of transparency. The longer and more convoluted the explanation, the more the public will be likely to become concerned, because it makes it seem as though they have something to hide. It will be very interesting to see what story they come up with for this one.