By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Mora Namdar, a part-time beauty salon owner and attorney, has been appointed as the Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, granting her authority over visa approvals and denials for entry into the United States. Namdar previously served in an interim role within the State Department during Trump’s first term and also contributed to Project 2025, which has influenced the administration’s policy decisions. Her confirmation places a politically connected figure with media experience in a critical role that directly impacts who is allowed into the country. This appointment follows the administration’s ban of citizens from various European countries due to censorship of American viewpoints on social media.
Read the original article here
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – Well, isn’t this something? The idea of a beauty salon owner, with a background in foreign policy, suddenly taking the reins of deciding who gets to enter the United States is, to put it mildly, unconventional. It’s the kind of headline that makes you do a double-take and question the reality of the situation. The fact that she’s also a contributor to Project 2025 just adds another layer of intrigue, or perhaps, depending on your perspective, alarm. This whole scenario just seems to amplify the already existing concerns and questions.
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – Let’s break it down, shall we? This woman, Mora Namdar, is the daughter of Iranian immigrants, and it seems she’s risen through the ranks to a position of considerable power. She’s gone from working on U.S. foreign policy to becoming the assistant secretary for consular affairs, which means she’s now in charge of everything from passports to visas. And, of course, the big one – deciding who gets banned. This shift, coupled with her involvement in Project 2025, which has been described as a major influencer for a potential second term, paints a very specific picture. There is definitely a specific message that is trying to be conveyed.
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – The fact that she also runs a chain of beauty salons is, well, an interesting detail. It highlights the kind of diverse resume this appointment embraces. Some might see it as a relatable background, some as completely irrelevant. It adds a bit of texture to the narrative. And of course, there’s the photo. The mention of “the pretty filter cranked up” isn’t just about the picture itself, but it speaks to a broader critique of Trump’s priorities. It suggests that optics and appearance might be playing a bigger role than qualifications, which in the grand scheme of things, might be a more important consideration.
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – Then there’s the broader context. Project 2025, with its potential impact on a second Trump term, introduces a whole new level of concern. It suggests a pre-planned agenda, and the appointment of Namdar could be seen as a piece of that puzzle. It leads to speculation about the kind of changes we might see. One comment about the “Central Casting” mentality of only caring about looks might not be that far off from the truth.
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – The discussion then moves into familiar territory: accusations of cronyism and nepotism. The idea that Trump might be hiring people based on personal preferences, rather than qualifications, is a recurring theme. The comments about his potential interest in her and even the Epstein files raise the stakes considerably. It highlights a common critique of Trump, that he surrounds himself with people who are loyal to him, even if they aren’t necessarily the best people for the job.
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – And of course, there’s the inevitable commentary on the perceived hypocrisy of it all. The phrase “ladder pullers” brings up the idea of people climbing the social ladder and then, once they’re at the top, cutting off the path for others. In this case, it might be suggested that Namdar, as an Iranian immigrant herself, may be seen as acting against her own community. There’s a lot of focus on the apparent lack of experience.
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – There’s a bit of dark humor to be found, such as the quip about keeping Kristi Noem’s face looking good, or the idea that this is just one of many unqualified hires. These comments are laced with the frustration. It’s a way of highlighting the absurdity of the situation. Some are even implying that this is all a deliberate ploy to undermine the system.
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – The more serious critiques start to surface, particularly in the questioning of why women would support someone who has a history of questionable behavior. The discussion goes on to express serious concern. In some opinions, this type of appointment, is just setting the stage for more draconian measures.
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – A few comments touch on the perceived hypocrisy of the “anti-DEI” crowd. This touches on the point that Trump, with his personal system of nepotism and cronyism, has arguably put more unqualified people in positions of power than any actual DEI policy ever could. There’s also the jab about “faceTune” and the idea that all these appointees seem to have a certain look. This again points to what’s viewed as the lack of seriousness in the whole process.
Trump Hires Beauty Salon Owner to Decide Who to Ban From U.S. – The conclusion, is that this entire scenario, is both alarming and, in a way, predictable. It’s a perfect example of what many perceive as a government run on nepotism, cronyism, and personal relationships, rather than merit. The question is, does this appointment represent the changing of the guard, or does it go against everything that the Trump campaign says they represent? The only way to find out is to watch, wait, and see how this all unfolds.