By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In her resignation letter, Habba cited a flawed blue slip tradition and politically motivated judges as reasons for stepping down as U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey. Federal judges refused to extend her appointment, and her planned successor was fired, leaving the role unfilled. Despite her departure, Habba emphasized her commitment to the Department of Justice, announcing she will continue to serve as the Senior Advisor to the Attorney General for U.S. Attorneys. She asserts her decision is not a surrender and vows to continue her fight, now expanding it nationally.
Read the original article here
Trump Pulls a Sudden 180 on Releasing Boat Strike Video, it seems, has become the headline, and it’s quite a story. Just a few days after promising the public they’d get a look at drone footage from a recent airstrike, the former president has done a complete about-face. The initial announcement promised transparency, but now, it appears the promised footage may never see the light of day. This sudden change of heart is certainly drawing a lot of speculation, and, frankly, it’s not exactly surprising.
The initial promise to release the video sparked a lot of anticipation. Now, the flip-flop is viewed by some as an indicator of some deeper issue, the details of which remain obfuscated. The immediate reaction from many is, “of course,” especially given the context of previous instances where promised transparency took a backseat to political maneuvering. Some are wondering if the footage itself is now deemed “problematic,” raising questions about what it might actually contain. Would the video show something that would be damning? Or simply the truth?
Many are already cynical, and the predictable nature of this reversal is fueling that cynicism. The phrase “Democrat hoax” is already being tossed around, a familiar refrain that is part of the established pattern of denial and deflection. It’s almost as if some see the whole affair as an open-and-shut case. The boat had drugs, the video will not be released. The logic is, if the administration claims there’s evidence and then refuses to show it, the assumption leans toward guilt or something to be hidden.
This sort of move, unfortunately, is starting to feel all too familiar. Comparisons to the Epstein files are already being made, pointing to another instance of withheld information and the potential for inconvenient truths to stay buried. There’s a real frustration boiling here – the expectation of transparency, the promise of accountability, and then the abrupt shift to silence. The whole thing feels like a strategic game of cat and mouse, where the public is constantly kept in the dark, and one wonders if the video ever existed in the first place.
There’s the suggestion that someone, perhaps a trusted advisor, intervened to stop the release. Maybe someone saw the video and realized it contained something that would do more harm than good. Others are focusing on the details of the incident itself, questioning the facts of what happened, the number of people on board, and the amount of drugs. The lack of information only feeds the speculation. Why was the boat targeted? What exactly was on board? Was this a case of a misguided strike?
The entire situation has become a caricature of itself. People are already joking about heavily edited versions of the video being released, or only snippets that are carefully designed to shape a narrative. Others are thinking of how long it will take to “find” the video, if it’s “lost,” or if it will be blamed on someone else.
The incident is also prompting broader reflections on the American political system, especially when considering European monarchies. The comparison underscores the lack of accountability and the potential for powerful individuals to avoid the consequences of their actions.
The overall sentiment is one of extreme skepticism, and why wouldn’t it be? It’s easy to see why trust in the administration is at an all-time low. People are tired of empty promises and the feeling of being manipulated. Withholding information only deepens the divide between the public and the political establishment. The whole thing has become a tiresome exercise in predictable political gamesmanship.
The public is likely to stay in the dark.