By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent Emerson College poll reveals a significant portion of the public, 36%, gave President Trump an “F” grade on his handling of the economy, representing the most common response. This economic dissatisfaction, with cost of living as a primary concern, could negatively affect the GOP’s prospects in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections. The survey also highlighted poor ratings in healthcare and affordability, despite better scores on immigration. Experts suggest that a worsening economic outlook could mirror historical trends where presidents with low approval ratings faced substantial losses in midterm elections.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump scores ‘F’ grade on the economy: Poll, and let’s face it, that grade seems about right, maybe even generous. The responses here paint a picture of, well, let’s just say a profound disagreement with his economic performance. It’s an “F,” and not just any “F,” but an “F-minus-minus-minus-minus,” as some have quipped. One commenter pointed out that even his predecessor, George W. Bush, also received an “F”. The sentiment seems to be that Republican economic policies, in general, are fundamentally flawed.
It’s clear that many people find it frustrating to see claims of economic success when the reality seems so different. The contrasting experiences are highlighted, such as a wealthy acquaintance posting about how wonderful Christmas is now, while simultaneously people are clearly struggling, if you look beyond the financial bubble. The issue of perception versus reality is central to much of the commentary.
Then there’s the inevitable response, the Trumpian spin. We all know how he might react to an “F”: it would become an “A++++++,” or maybe a “Fantastic.” The idea of Trump claiming “F” stands for something positive, like “Fabulous” or “Fantastic,” perfectly captures the disconnect some perceive between his rhetoric and the actual state of affairs. And of course, the jokes abound, with some suggesting a new grade: maybe a “G” for “Gawwwd Damn this sucks!” The commentary is laced with sarcasm and a healthy dose of disbelief.
This is a recurring theme of the negative comments – his history of bankrupting his own businesses. If he can’t manage his own financial affairs, how could anyone trust him to manage the economy? The argument underscores the perceived lack of competence and the potential for financial disaster under his leadership. One commenter mentions how he’s got a “Midas like curse, except everything he touches turns to shit.”
The discussion also turns to the reaction of his supporters, “the cult,” as it were. Some suggest that they’re either convinced of the economic success because of the stock market or, conveniently, blame the current administration. This points to the polarization of the issue, where facts seem secondary to political affiliation. The divide is emphasized: the idea that those who gave him an “A” or “B” are essentially part of a “cult” that is willfully blind to any economic negatives.
The idea that he would have a third term is met with scorn. The general feeling being that he would lose in a landslide. It’s safe to say there is a general consensus that the people are beginning to see the real effects of what’s happening.
The underlying message is clear: the poll results, indicating a failing grade on the economy, reflect a widespread sentiment that Trump’s economic policies have been, and would continue to be, detrimental to the average American. The various jokes and jabs only highlight the seriousness of the issue for many.