By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Sources indicate that former President Donald Trump is considering pardons for advisors and policymakers as his administration faces legal scrutiny. These potential pardons could encompass key policy figures, such as Stephen Miller, and are reportedly being discussed among Trump, senior aides, and federal appointees. Trump’s inner circle is purportedly preparing a defense, with some pointing to former President Joe Biden’s pardons as precedent. While Trump previously criticized Biden’s use of the pardon power, he now appears to be contemplating similar actions amidst growing legal challenges.
Read the original article here
Trump Is Already Weighing Pardons for His Inner Circle
So, the talk is already swirling, isn’t it? The whispers, the speculations – all pointing towards a familiar playbook. Trump, it seems, is already mulling over pardons, not just for himself, but for those closest to him, his inner circle, those who’ve ridden shotgun through the tumultuous journey of his political life. The timing, well, it’s not exactly a surprise. It’s the kind of move that feels almost preordained, a predictable dance in the face of mounting legal clouds.
The key players are apparently the usual suspects. Think of Stephen Miller, the architect of some pretty controversial immigration policies, and others who were instrumental in shaping the policies of the administration. It’s a roster that could potentially include figures facing serious allegations, even war crime allegations, like former Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The potential breadth of this pardon power is vast, and that’s what’s causing such a stir.
This isn’t just about individual cases, though. It’s about a pattern. Trump has already shown a considerable penchant for using his executive authority, issuing a large number of pardons and commutations. This early activity raises questions, and highlights the potential for abuse. The core issue is the very nature of these pardons. Are they acts of leadership, or are they acknowledgements of potential wrongdoing?
Looking ahead, it’s clear there’s a strong belief that this situation needs more oversight. Perhaps it’s time to consider a constitutional amendment to add some checks and balances on the president’s pardon power. Requiring congressional confirmation for pardons is a good suggestion. These things are designed to stop abuse, and hopefully, this situation can act as a catalyst for reform.
The underlying sentiment is, of course, that Trump’s supporters have caused irreparable harm, and a simple clean-up will be inadequate. Some believe that the answer lies in pursuing state-level crimes, effectively circumventing the presidential pardon. The notion of pardons being issued before charges are even filed, let alone a conviction, is certainly raising eyebrows. The potential for such actions to undermine the very principles of justice is a concern many are bringing to the forefront.
Let’s not forget the inherent questions about the legality and legitimacy of these pardons, especially if the president himself were to face removal from office. What happens to those pardons if Trump is impeached, convicted, and removed from office, or even deemed unfit to serve under the 25th Amendment? There are valid questions about their validity under those circumstances.
The conversation naturally veers into the question of how all these players will respond. Will they scramble to secure their escape, or will they face the music? This is the kind of situation that could lead to widespread state-level charges and investigations. The very idea of the system, if not the administration, being broken is a common refrain.
There’s speculation that these pardons could potentially be issued for anything, and it’s easy to see why, given the scope of the potential legal issues surrounding this administration. Could this potentially extend to terrorists? The fact is, the wheels are already in motion.
Legally, politically, it will be fascinating to see how it plays out. The assumption is that Trump knows, that his team knows, that there has been wrongdoing and illegalities committed. It suggests a preemptive move to protect those implicated. Many believe that the only focus for this administration will be the securing of personal wealth and assets, knowing careers are over.
The scope of potential pardons is under the microscope. One of the ideas is that Congress should have the pardon power. There are thoughts about the potential for blanket pardons and the implications of this approach. There’s also the question of whether or not these pardons could be reversed. The point is to make sure those people are in a position to testify about the real crimes.
The conversation is complex, covering everything from war crimes to state-level crimes. The conclusion is that Trump, and his circle, will be held accountable.