By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Breaking news reveals a stunning turn of events regarding former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández, who was serving a lengthy sentence for cocaine trafficking. Despite his conviction and the prospect of decades in prison, Hernández is now slated for release. This dramatic shift follows an intervention by former President Trump, who, interrupting his holiday, declared he would issue a full pardon for Hernández. This decision comes just before Honduras’s elections and follows Trump’s endorsement of the presidential candidate from Hernández’s party.
Read the original article here
He flooded the US with cocaine. Now Trump is going to pardon him – and honestly, it’s pretty shocking, though maybe it shouldn’t be. When you step back and look at the whole picture, it paints a pretty disturbing image of the current state of affairs. It’s the kind of thing that makes you wonder what’s really going on, what the motivations are, and who’s really calling the shots.
The fact that a former president, known for his “tough on crime” rhetoric, would even consider pardoning a drug lord who’s responsible for importing tons of cocaine into the US is beyond hypocritical. It completely contradicts the idea of fighting a “war on drugs” that we’ve heard so much about. It really makes you question the sincerity behind all the talk about border security and drug interdiction efforts. Where’s the outrage from those who claim to be so concerned about drug-related crime? It’s crickets.
The blatant double standard is what really gets to me. On one hand, you have people talking tough about bombing boats and cracking down on drug trafficking, and on the other, you have the same people seemingly turning a blind eye to someone who was directly responsible for the massive influx of narcotics. It’s a classic case of selective enforcement, and it’s hard not to see it as a political maneuver, perhaps with some personal benefit involved. It makes you wonder how deep the connections really go and what kind of deals are being made behind closed doors.
Then there’s the question of motivation. Why would Trump, or anyone in his orbit, want to pardon a drug lord? Well, the obvious answer is money. Let’s be honest, there’s always a financial angle when it comes to people like this. It wouldn’t be surprising if there were large cash deposits, perhaps from the Caribbean or South America, that played a role. Or maybe, and this is speculation, but maybe there’s a personal connection. Did someone in the former president’s inner circle have a vested interest? Is someone in his family in need of a new supplier? It’s hard not to connect the dots and think of personal gain as the driving force.
It’s also interesting how this pardon plays into the narrative of the Trump base. Will they defend it? Will they ignore it? Or will they just chalk it up to some kind of political calculation that they can’t or won’t defend? It’s a real test of loyalty, and it will be fascinating to see how they try to rationalize this one. I have a feeling there will be a lot of mental gymnastics involved. I mean, how do you reconcile “tough on crime” with letting a drug kingpin go free?
The whole situation also highlights the cynicism that many feel about politics in general. It reinforces the idea that the rules don’t apply to everyone and that power is often used for personal gain. It makes you wonder how much the public is being manipulated and how much they’re being kept in the dark about what’s really going on. It really is like he is selling pardons, plain and simple.
You can’t help but wonder what will be next. Will the pardoned drug lord be given a job within the Trump organization? Will he somehow become involved in the political scene? What kind of favors will be exchanged? It really does make you feel like you are watching some kind of reality TV show, one where the outcome is anything but certain. I mean, if he’s flooding the country with cocaine, who benefits?
It is the blatant disregard for the rule of law and the obvious self-interest that’s really galling. It’s a reminder that political power can be used to benefit those in power, even if it means undermining the very principles that are supposedly being upheld. I wonder how people can look themselves in the mirror knowing this is happening, particularly those who were supposedly very critical of the “deep state” during his term.
In the end, this whole situation is another sign of the times. It’s another example of how politics, money, and personal connections can intertwine to create a reality that’s far from just or fair. It’s a story of blatant hypocrisy, potential corruption, and the erosion of trust in the institutions that are supposed to protect us. It’s a story that is, unfortunately, becoming all too familiar.