By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Trump administration has suspended leases for five large-scale offshore wind projects along the East Coast, citing national security risks identified by the Pentagon. This action follows a previous federal court ruling that struck down an executive order blocking wind energy projects. The Interior Department will now work with the Defense Department to assess and mitigate potential security concerns posed by the projects, although specific risks were not detailed. Wind proponents are criticizing the move, claiming that the decision is another attempt to undermine the growth of renewable energy.
Read the original article here
The Trump administration suspends 5 wind projects off the East Coast, citing national security concerns.
It’s hard not to be cynical, isn’t it? When the Trump administration suddenly hits the brakes on five offshore wind projects along the East Coast, the official line is “national security.” But, let’s be honest, the narrative feels a bit… thin. Especially when the very individuals making these decisions have a documented history of cozying up to industries that stand to lose if clean energy flourishes. The immediate thought is, could it be anything other than a blatant attempt to appease the oil and gas (and now, according to the edit, coal) industries?
The official story involves the Interior Department and the Defense Department, supposedly working together to assess potential security risks posed by these projects. It’s framed as a pause, not a cancellation, with no end date specified. That’s a clever way to buy time, to drag things out while the administration potentially aligns policy with its preferred donors. But, let’s face it, the whole thing reeks of political maneuvering. It’s a classic move: invoke the magic words of “national security” and suddenly, critical infrastructure projects can be delayed or even dismantled.
The implications are far-reaching. One of the projects was already up and running, providing cheap power. Now, they’re potentially disrupting the clean energy supply during a period where everyone is dealing with rising energy costs. And, it’s not just about the cost, either. Renewable energy sources are becoming cheaper and more efficient every single year. Compared to the old guard of oil and gas, it’s a better product. But, as we all know, a superior product doesn’t always win in a system where the “inferior” one has the resources to buy influence. It’s a clear illustration of how crony capitalism can replace free-market principles.
The Trump administration’s tendency to use “national security” as a blanket excuse is almost comical, if it weren’t so damaging. The very person who is making these decisions is the same guy who seems to have little regard for classified documents and whose actions have generated real security concerns. It’s a disturbing trend: wielding the powers of the presidency, especially the broad authority to define national security interests, to serve personal or partisan agendas. We’re left wondering if the intention is to protect the nation or simply to line the pockets of a select few. The Supreme Court even gave him a green light to do what he wants in the name of “national security.”
It’s a pattern, isn’t it? “National security” becomes the justification for everything: tariffs, redactions, canceling wind farms. The question becomes, what’s next? And in the realm of all of this posturing, the real issues are glossed over. This isn’t about ensuring the continued functioning of the government; it’s about protecting the interests of the powerful. The administration is essentially admitting that they have a problem with something like renewable energy. And, in the meantime, they distract from the things that are really concerning.
Ultimately, this whole situation highlights the erosion of trust and the corruption of institutions. The “national security” card is played, while the real risks – rising energy costs, the delay of clean energy, and the concentration of power in the hands of a few – are ignored. What we see here is not a defense of national security; it’s the defense of entrenched interests, and a continuation of the administration’s pattern of putting personal gain and political expediency ahead of the public good. The move can also be tied to Trump’s new venture into the energy business, a move that suggests ulterior motives in suppressing wind energy.