By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a striking turn of events, an investigation reveals that former President Donald Trump engaged in the same actions he is accusing his political opponents of, specifically mortgage fraud. The report details that in 1993, Trump secured mortgages for two Florida properties, claiming each as his principal residence, despite evidence suggesting he did not reside in either. Experts have noted the hypocrisy, particularly considering Trump’s administration has used similar claims to target political adversaries like Lisa Cook and Letitia James. Trump’s spokesperson responded by claiming no fraud, while the former president himself has not commented on the matter.
Read the original article here
Records Show That Trump, by His Own Definition, is Guilty of Mortgage Fraud. This is a startling assertion, but one that emerges naturally from the patterns of behavior and statements attributed to Donald Trump. It’s almost as if he lays out the playbook himself. The recurring theme throughout his public pronouncements and actions seems to be that he accuses others of the very things he himself is engaged in. It’s a pattern, and it’s a pretty consistent one.
The accusations, if examined closely, often mirror Trump’s own past and present dealings. This isn’t just a matter of speculation or conjecture; it’s a pattern that has emerged over the years. Consider the various legal battles and investigations he has faced. From business practices to personal conduct, the accusations he throws at his opponents frequently reflect the allegations against him. This isn’t a coincidence; it’s a tactic.
Trump’s history, as detailed in various reports, lends further credence to the assertion that he’s guilty of mortgage fraud, based on his own established patterns of accusation. The idea is that he sees a legal problem or scandal coming his way, so he accuses others of the same thing. Look at his repeated claims about “crooked” opponents, or “sleepy” rivals. They often appear to be projections.
The repeated accusations, when viewed through this lens, begin to take on a different meaning. They are not merely attacks on political opponents. They can be seen as admissions, as if he’s confessing to his own misdeeds through his public accusations. This tactic is consistent with the idea that he believes the rules don’t apply to him.
This “rules for thee, not for me” attitude seems to be a defining characteristic. This attitude is reinforced by statements that suggest a sense of invincibility, a belief that he is above the law. These words and actions paint a consistent picture. If he can get away with it, then it is fine.
The core of the matter centers around the economy and how its shifts can impact everything. A failing economy, as many fear could be a possibility, often leads to political upheaval, and could certainly damage Trump’s political prospects. His accusations against others would likely continue to be made regardless of this.
The Republicans, as some point out, seem to be in a difficult position, even with their base. It’s not just about politics; it is about basic economic realities that affect the average person’s life. The price of everyday goods has gone up and continues to go up, and people feel the effects. This is even true of the people who might otherwise support Trump and his party.
The concerns about the future are also worth noting. The concerns about potential violence or attempts to subvert the democratic process need to be considered. The fact that Trump seems to have a history of doing precisely what he accuses others of, is a significant part of that equation.
In this context, the accusation of mortgage fraud takes on additional weight. It’s not just an isolated charge; it’s part of a broader pattern of behavior. As the saying goes, “Every accusation is a confession.” If Trump’s history is any guide, there is a strong basis to believe that he might be guilty of the very things he accuses others of, including the suggestion of mortgage fraud.
The statements and behaviors of Trump suggest a pattern, and that pattern points to the probability of his guilt in a variety of areas. This includes the potential for mortgage fraud, by his own definition. It’s a chilling reminder of the importance of accountability and the need for a legal system that applies equally to everyone, regardless of wealth or power.