By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former President Donald Trump is asserting executive privilege to block access to over 4,000 documents related to the January 6th Capitol riot. This claim is being made in response to a lawsuit from injured police officers seeking information about Trump’s actions that day. The National Archives has revealed that Trump aims to keep these records private, which also includes text messages. Further complicating matters, any documents reluctantly released to the plaintiffs will be sealed, preventing public access to the details of the riot.
Read the original article here
Trump Claims Executive Privilege To Keep More Than 4,000 January 6 Documents Locked Up
So, here we are again, staring down the barrel of another potential cover-up. It’s truly fascinating, in a deeply frustrating way, to watch the same playbook being dusted off and deployed again. This time, it centers around Trump’s attempt to keep a mountain of documents – over 4,000 in number – related to the January 6th events under lock and key, citing executive privilege. And you have to admit, the irony is thick enough to spread on a bagel, considering the constant claims of transparency and the “witch hunt” narrative surrounding the whole situation. It’s hard not to be cynical.
Let’s break down what this really means. Essentially, anything that was reluctantly handed over to the authorities is now going to be sealed back up, keeping the public in the dark about the facts surrounding what happened on that day. The implication, and it’s pretty hard to miss, is that there are things in those documents that Trump desperately doesn’t want anyone to see. And, you know, it’s not exactly a confidence booster when someone claims innocence but fights tooth and nail to keep potential evidence hidden. This whole scenario just reeks of someone trying to bury something that might make them look even worse than they already do.
The question of whether Trump can successfully pull this off hangs heavily in the balance, especially considering the current makeup of the Supreme Court. There’s a distinct possibility that the courts could agree that it’s okay to replace the facts with a more flattering narrative. Now, that’s where it gets truly concerning. It’s a classic case of attempting to control the narrative, of manipulating the perception of events, of essentially rewriting history.
And it does raise the question: What exactly is in those documents that warrants this level of secrecy? If there’s nothing to hide, as the claims go, then why the fight to keep them hidden? This immediately makes you wonder if Trump’s actions were coordinated with others, as it would be an implicit admission that their actions were linked to the former President. This begs the question of national security, because it’s hard to see how keeping those documents from view would protect national security, the given reason for using executive privilege.
Of course, there’s another layer to this, and that’s the perception of the current administration’s handling of the situation. Some are pointing fingers at the current administration, saying they could have done more, sooner, to ensure these documents were available to the public. It’s a valid criticism, in some ways. A lot of people are scratching their heads wondering how the “most transparent administration” can hide documents and then be surprised that people think they are hiding things. Regardless, you have to wonder why some people are always hiding the evidence of their actions.
This all echoes other moments in history, specifically, the Watergate scandal. The parallels are hard to ignore. We see a former president allegedly trying to use the powers of his office to shield information, which could be used as evidence against him. It’s a familiar script, and it never ends well for those trying to hide the truth.
The fact is, it’s always a red flag when someone fights so hard against transparency. It leads to the natural conclusion that there’s something they don’t want us to see. Perhaps it’s information about what was happening with foreign governments or private corporate entities. Whatever it is, the attempt to keep it hidden only fuels suspicion and erodes trust. You can’t help but wonder if there would be a different reaction if this was done by a Democrat.
The underlying sentiment is clear: this situation is frustrating and has a lot of people asking the same questions: Why is this happening? What is Trump trying to hide? And, perhaps most importantly, what is going to be done about it? The fight for transparency, and ultimately justice, seems to be ongoing.