By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a Christmas reception, former President Donald Trump alleged the 2020 election was rigged by Democrats and claimed to possess substantial evidence to prove it. He asserted that the evidence would be revealed “in truckloads,” implying a vast amount of proof of election fraud. Trump also stated he would have won California if the election had been legitimate, further highlighting his allegations of widespread voter interference. While making these claims, Trump also diverted to other topics, including comments about a woman in the crowd and a story about a snake bite.
Read the original article here
“Professionals at cheating”: Trump claims “truckloads” of evidence that Dems rigged elections is the recurring theme. It seems we’re back in familiar territory, yet again, with the former president making allegations of widespread election fraud. The consistent pattern is, accusations without any verifiable proof. The immediate thought that comes to mind is the sheer repetition of this narrative. Why, one might wonder, would Democrats be so adept at rigging elections in 2020 but somehow not bother in 2024? The inconsistency is glaring.
The irony here is palpable. This comes from someone who, if you believe the assertions, had help from figures like Putin and Musk in previous elections. This also comes from the same individual who demanded a halt to vote counting when it looked like his numbers were dipping on election night. If this supposed “truckload” of evidence actually exists, the only reasonable course of action would be to release it and allow the authorities to take appropriate legal steps. The failure to do so, especially when coupled with the absence of investigations, raises serious questions about the credibility of the claims. This whole charade appears irresponsible.
One can’t ignore the history of these kinds of claims. It’s a familiar script. Trump has been at this game for years, seemingly since his political career began. He was calling Obama a cheater back in 2008 and Hillary in 2016. Now the accusations target Biden and Kamala, with the same unfounded accusations. It’s hard not to see this as a pattern of behavior – a consistent assault on the integrity of elections and the democratic process itself. If the man truly does not believe in free and fair elections, then how can anyone trust his motivations for running again?
Perhaps this is the groundwork for 2028. It’s almost as if he’s laying the foundation to invalidate future elections, even before they happen. Every time he makes these claims, and fails to provide any evidence, there is the potential to expose his own potential actions. Accusations, in this context, really feel more like admissions. If there is some doubt, one has to remember his previous accusations.
The more one hears about Democrats cheating, the more likely one becomes to believe that Trump is the one rigging every vote. There is no evidence, just a litany of complaints about supposed cheating that never materializes with proof. So, what about the money? If the Democrats are so good at this, why aren’t they in control? It begs the question of where all the money is going and where the priorities of these leaders actually reside. One is left with the feeling that this is just a distraction to cover up something else.
Then there is the issue of evidence. We’re told it exists. We’re told it’s coming. We’re told it’s in the form of “truckloads.” Yet, it never materializes. All the lawsuits that have been presented based on these claims have been dismissed. Is it any surprise that there is nothing to see? It’s another accusation, another confession, another lie.
It becomes clear that there is a consistent psychological pattern. The moment Trump is accused of something, he immediately deflects and accuses someone else of the same thing. It is a defense mechanism – a desperate attempt to undermine the legitimacy of any investigation or criticism. It’s classic projection, where he’s most likely guilty of something, and now is the time to spread the blame. There is the distinct feeling of wanting a third term, so he desperately seeks justification.
This is more than just a political tactic; it’s a fundamental threat to the democratic process. By continually undermining faith in elections, he’s paving the way for further manipulation and the potential for undemocratic outcomes. The insistence on this narrative, without any supporting evidence, is nothing short of an assault on the truth. The only solution is to stop the madness.