By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a recent event, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated that no corporate-made infant formula could surpass the nutritional value of breast milk. The event also featured Representative Duffy, who humorously acknowledged the unusual nature of three men discussing breastfeeding and options for nursing. The focus then shifted to the lack of adequate nursing facilities in airports, with conservative content creator Isabel Brown addressing the issue. Notably, Paul Saladino, known for promoting pseudoscience, did not contribute to the discussion on breastfeeding.
Read the original article here
Trump Personally Intervenes to Block Release of January 6 Documents | Donald Trump is blocking access in a lawsuit brought by police officers injured in the January 6 riot. It’s really something, isn’t it? The core of this issue centers on Donald Trump’s determined efforts to prevent the public from accessing documents related to the January 6th Capitol riot. This isn’t just about a desire for privacy; it’s a direct intervention in a lawsuit brought by police officers who were injured during the events of that day. The timing and the circumstances surrounding this are crucial. He’s actively trying to keep certain information under wraps, and the reasons behind that are what’s fueling so much speculation and concern.
We have to ask, why the resistance? Trump has cited executive privilege, the idea that the President needs to have candid advice and conversations without fear of disclosure. The rationale is that releasing these documents could potentially harm the separation of powers and make it harder for future Presidents to get good advice. This is the official line, but the reality is much more complex, and frankly, doesn’t ring true when you consider the totality of events.
One of the biggest questions swirling around this is, what exactly is he trying to hide? It’s not a stretch to wonder if these documents might reveal uncomfortable truths about Trump’s role, or perhaps his knowledge of events leading up to the riot. There are whispers of things like Trump’s awareness of some of his supporters being armed, or even the possibility that he might have discouraged security checks. If any of these are true, that would be significant and damaging. It adds to the picture of a man who may have been playing a more active part than he’s willing to admit.
It’s natural to be suspicious when someone actively tries to suppress evidence. “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear” is a common phrase, and it rings true here. When you actively work to block the release of information, it raises a lot of eyebrows. Why go to such lengths if you have nothing to hide? This is especially true when it involves a day that shook the foundation of American democracy. This is why many people are saying that it feels like a cover-up.
And consider the context. This isn’t an isolated incident. There are mentions of the Epstein files and other instances of trying to hide information. It suggests a pattern, a tendency to control the narrative at any cost. This behavior, if repeated, starts to look less like a series of isolated incidents and more like a deliberate strategy to shield himself from accountability.
The timing of this is important, too. It’s occurring amid a lawsuit filed by police officers who were injured during the riot. These are the people who put their lives on the line that day. They deserve answers. They are seeking justice, and it’s difficult to see how blocking the release of documents serves that cause. It feels like Trump is prioritizing his own interests above those of the officers who were affected.
The response from different political factions is, of course, starkly divided. For his supporters, it may be seen as a courageous act, a defense against a politically motivated witch hunt. But for many others, it’s a clear indication that something is being hidden, that there is something to be ashamed of. It is an insult to the people who were attacked.
The idea that the events of January 6th were somehow a “Democrat hoax” or the work of Antifa is a convenient fiction at best, particularly when you compare that narrative to the evidence coming to light. The rhetoric surrounding this, and the attempts to discredit the reality of what happened, are clear indications that there are elements of this that certain actors don’t want the general public to see.
It’s all quite ironic when you consider the “Most Transparent Administration Ever!!!!” The fact is, blocking information doesn’t exude transparency. It is the opposite of that, and it will be quite interesting to see how the courts respond to this. It’s going to be a battle, but one thing is clear: Trump’s efforts to block the release of the January 6th documents are raising serious questions about his actions and his motivations, and whether he has been truthful about what happened that day.