By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the death of Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, at their home, former President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to comment on the matter. In his post, Trump attacked Reiner and blamed him for his own death, citing “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” Law enforcement officials have arrested Reiner’s son, Nick, and are treating the case as a murder investigation. The post drew criticism from multiple figures who expressed outrage over Trump’s insensitive remarks.
Read the original article here
Let’s break this down. The core issue is that Donald Trump, in the wake of Rob Reiner’s tragic death, is being accused of making the situation about himself and, more concerningly, implying that Reiner’s political views were somehow responsible. The comments paint a picture of Trump seemingly embracing the idea of “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (TDS), but in a twisted way, by suggesting it was Reiner’s supposed affliction that led to his demise. The immediate reaction is one of disgust and outrage, fueled by the perception that Trump is incapable of showing empathy or respect, even in the face of death.
It’s clear from the comments that there is a deep-seated animosity toward Trump. The use of strong language like “POS” (Piece of Sh*t), “deranged,” “psychotic sociopath,” and “shit human” reveals the level of disdain. The sentiment expressed goes beyond mere disagreement; it’s a visceral reaction to Trump’s perceived character and actions. The frequent references to Trump’s narcissism, his need to make everything about himself, and his lack of compassion are central to this negative assessment.
The accusation is that Trump is effectively saying that Reiner “deserved” what happened to him because of his opposition. This is a very serious charge, suggesting that Trump might be encouraging violence or condoning it based on political differences. The idea that Trump might be “calling for the deaths of Democrats again” stems from this interpretation, drawing a parallel to previous instances where his words have been seen as inflammatory or inciting.
A large part of the conversation focuses on “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (TDS). Ironically, the commentary suggests that Trump is the one suffering from a more acute form of it. The idea being presented here is that Trump is, in fact, the one who is “deranged,” that his behavior is symptomatic of a serious psychological issue. The fact that the responses view the use of TDS is being leveraged here in such a twisted manner, underscores the perceived irony and hypocrisy of it all. It is viewed as an excuse, or a way to deflect from his own conduct.
There is significant anger directed toward Trump’s supporters, with the implication that they are part of a “cult” that has enabled his behavior. The comments express frustration with the millions of people who have apparently embraced Trump as a “messiah,” accusing them of being blinded by their devotion. The idea is that his supporters are, in effect, complicit in enabling the perceived damage that Trump is causing.
The comparisons being drawn between Trump and other figures are revealing. The reference to Jeffrey Epstein, suggests a pattern of behavior and associations that are being perceived as deeply problematic. The mention of Charlie Kirk and Jimmy Kimmel further illustrates how Trump’s critics feel he is often treated differently by the media and public than other people, and the lack of accountability the former president may have.
The overarching theme is a sense of outrage at what is perceived as a complete lack of decency and empathy on Trump’s part. It’s a very common complaint – that his ego overrides every situation. The comments reveal a deep-seated frustration with a political figure who is seen as being wholly self-absorbed and incapable of acknowledging the gravity of a situation without turning it into an opportunity to promote himself. The overall impression is one of disgust, disbelief, and a profound disappointment in the former president’s character.