By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The United States, under the Trump administration, tacitly approved of and even assisted Ukraine’s strikes on Russia’s energy infrastructure and “shadow fleet.” Reportedly, this was a shift from the previous administration’s stance and included providing intelligence for attack planning. Despite potential risks to the global market, the U.S. views these attacks as a means of pressuring Russia and prompting peace negotiations. Furthermore, the U.S. has sanctioned major Russian oil companies as part of this strategy.
Read the original article here
Trump approves Ukraine’s strikes on Russia’s shadow fleet and gives aid. The news has been nothing short of a head-scratcher, hasn’t it? It’s like watching a high-stakes tennis match where the players constantly switch sides. One day, it’s all about appeasing Putin, and the next, it’s open season on Russian oil tankers. The whiplash is real, and the confusion is palpable. It’s hard to keep track of the day-to-day when the narrative seems to shift with the breeze.
The situation seems to be that Trump has, for reasons that remain murky, given the green light for Ukraine to target Russia’s shadow fleet. This fleet, as I understand it, is a collection of ships used to sidestep sanctions and keep Russia’s oil flowing. This approval is coupled with, and this is where it gets more interesting, the provision of aid. This kind of about-face is the opposite of the stance that was adopted previously and leaves everyone wondering what the true intentions are.
Now, one of the more interesting theories circulating is that this move is directly linked to the pursuit of oil, pure and simple. The idea is that Trump is less concerned with the moral implications of the war and more focused on the potential for personal gain, and on securing oil. The suggestion is that he might be trying to undermine Russia’s oil revenue capacity and perhaps even get his hands on some of that oil himself, and not with the goal of helping Ukraine.
The timing, of course, is everything. Perhaps there’s been some outside pressure, maybe the EU has reminded the administration of the consequences of siding with Russia. Perhaps there’s a new development that links the shadow fleet to Venezuela, which is of great importance. Or perhaps it’s simply a strategic maneuver to confuse everyone, especially the enemy. The motives are as cloudy as the smoke from a burning oil tanker.
It’s worth noting that this sudden shift is unlikely to signal a genuine change of heart. History suggests that this approval could be a temporary blip, and the situation could easily revert to the usual pattern of Ukraine-bashing as soon as the wind changes direction. This is the nature of the beast. The unpredictability of the subject makes it difficult to make sense of what’s truly going on.
Ultimately, the motivation behind this seemingly pro-Ukraine move is probably not altruistic. There’s likely a deeper game at play, perhaps involving financial interests, or the desire to exert pressure on a geopolitical opponent. The shadow fleet is a vulnerable target, and striking it could disrupt Russia’s war machine, so in effect, helping Ukraine. However, with the current political landscape, it’s difficult to assess the current intentions, and one can only wait for the next surprise.
In the meantime, the constant back-and-forth is enough to give anyone a headache. It’s an exhausting dance of shifting alliances and ever-changing priorities. One thing’s for sure: the story is far from over, and it’s a safe bet that tomorrow will bring another twist.