By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a cabinet meeting, President Trump announced the imminent commencement of land-based missile strikes against drug smugglers, escalating the ongoing conflict. This decision follows alleged war crimes committed during strikes on drug boats off the coast of Venezuela. Trump also stated that any country producing drugs that reach America is subject to these attacks. The administration’s actions and rhetoric are drawing criticism and prompting investigations, while also garnering support from certain figures.
Read the original article here
Trump says US will begin land strikes on Venezuela ‘very soon’. Okay, so the news is out, and it’s a bit of a bombshell. Trump, again, is talking about military action, this time targeting Venezuela with land strikes. Now, let’s just pause there for a second and unpack this. A “land strike” is, let’s be clear, another way of saying “war.” It’s a pretty bold move, especially since the context seems to be drug smuggling, which raises a whole host of questions about the justification and the potential consequences.
Trump says US will begin land strikes on Venezuela ‘very soon’, and this immediately sets off alarm bells. Many are drawing parallels to past conflicts, the “war on drugs” in Latin America is a well-trodden path. The suspicion is that this might be a smokescreen for other interests. The talk about the Epstein files, the push for oil, and the constant need to distract from internal problems create a narrative that is hard to ignore. It is easy to feel as though this is a classic playbook: start a conflict, claim noble motives, and reap the benefits (or at least try to).
Trump says US will begin land strikes on Venezuela ‘very soon’, and the immediate reaction is one of skepticism and concern. There’s a feeling that this is being rushed, that there’s a lack of transparency, and that Congress is being sidelined. The idea of launching a war without proper checks and balances is, to put it mildly, unsettling. Many are pointing out the potential for a humanitarian disaster, the possibility of getting bogged down in a long and costly conflict, and the risk of further destabilizing an already volatile region. The idea of this happening “very soon” feels particularly dangerous.
Trump says US will begin land strikes on Venezuela ‘very soon’. The fact that this is being framed around the “war on drugs” is not sitting well with many. It is seen as a thin veil. The history of US involvement in South and Central America is not exactly one of success when it comes to combating drugs. The underlying sentiment is that the real motivations are elsewhere – control of resources, a regime change, or perhaps just a way to deflect attention.
Trump says US will begin land strikes on Venezuela ‘very soon’, and the immediate worry is the potential for war crimes and abuses. There are worries about the president’s authority and whether these strikes are being conducted with any real legal justification. It’s a scary thought that the president is operating unilaterally. It suggests that there’s a real possibility of extrajudicial killings and a complete disregard for international law. The fact that the strikes seem to be targeting anyone who fits a “dubious criteria” of being a drug smuggler or a terrorist makes it even more worrying, as it suggests little to no oversight.
Trump says US will begin land strikes on Venezuela ‘very soon’, and one can’t help but feel a sense of déjà vu. The rhetoric, the justifications, the potential for disaster – it all feels familiar. This administration has a track record of using military intervention as a tool for achieving political goals. The history books are full of examples. This is being painted as a mission to “reduce crime,” the reality is that the rhetoric is often meant to incite hostilities towards immigrants, marginalized groups, and minorities.
Trump says US will begin land strikes on Venezuela ‘very soon’. The concern for many is the long-term cost. Not just the financial cost, but the human cost. The potential for loss of life, the damage to international relations, and the risk of getting stuck in another quagmire. The idea that this could all be happening to distract from domestic issues or to control the oil is deeply unsettling. The fact that he’s already talking about it, without a clear plan or Congressional approval, is alarming.
Trump says US will begin land strikes on Venezuela ‘very soon’, which is coupled with the idea of a need for a Nobel Peace Prize. It is hard to know whether to laugh or cry. The idea of starting a war to get a peace prize feels absurd, a complete contradiction. The situation is a mess, filled with potential for disaster, and it’s hard to see a positive outcome.