By John Q. Hosedrinker 
According to a recent report, Donald Trump’s advisors are urging him to shift his economic messaging and address the public’s concerns about the cost of living. They are advising him to cease blaming his predecessor, Joe Biden, for current economic issues and instead acknowledge the financial anxieties of many Americans. Trump has previously dismissed these concerns, claiming they are a “hoax,” but advisors believe this approach is not resonating with voters. To counter this, the president plans a public appearance tour starting in Pennsylvania to convince voters that the economy is improving under his potential second term, even while still placing blame on Biden.
Read the original article here
Trump Aides Beg Him to Stop Blaming Biden for His Own Mess | They’ve suddenly realized the president is alienating voters after recent elections showed a blue shift.
So, the buzz around the water cooler, or perhaps the gilded halls, seems to be that some folks in Trump’s orbit are finally starting to sweat. The core issue? The incessant finger-pointing at Joe Biden, seemingly for everything under the sun. It appears they’ve noticed a “blue shift,” as they call it, in recent election results. This is, in other words, a polite way of saying they’re losing ground and starting to get a little panicky about the future.
The fundamental problem, as they see it, is the constant deflection. It’s always Biden’s fault, apparently, for things that are, shall we say, a bit more rooted in the current administration. And here’s the kicker: it’s not just a matter of political strategy anymore. It’s about optics. When you’re in charge, and things aren’t going swimmingly, constantly blaming the guy who’s been gone for a while just makes you look… well, ineffective.
The aides, the so-called “weary” ones according to reports, are reportedly pleading with the president to shift gears. They’re saying, “Hey, focus on the present. Acknowledge the struggles people are facing, and offer solutions.” Instead of just blaming Biden, try offering something – anything – that addresses the actual concerns of voters. Show some empathy. Talk about the real financial anxieties people are experiencing, the rising cost of living, the increasing prices of everyday essentials.
Now, one can’t help but wonder if these advisors fully appreciate the person they’re advising. This isn’t just about losing some votes; this is about an ingrained pattern of behavior. Trump, the quintessential narcissist, has always deflected blame. He’s constitutionally incapable of admitting fault. Everything’s always somebody else’s problem, especially when it comes to any of his failures.
The proposed strategy is, in some ways, straightforward. Talk to voters about their pain, be more sympathetic to their issues, and show that you have the solutions. The goal is to set a contrast between the current administration’s plan and those of their political opponents. But the real problem here isn’t the strategy. It’s getting the man to actually implement it. The aides may be talking about elections, but the truth is it’s more about how it hits the man himself.
This is where the challenge lies. To persuade Trump to change his stripes is like asking a leopard to change its spots. The “Biden” card is his go-to move. It is his defense mechanism. Every criticism, every tough question, is answered with a blame game. It has become a habit, an integral part of his persona. In truth, it is even his identity.
And let’s be honest, his core supporters, the hardcore MAGA fanatics, won’t change their minds. They are dedicated, often to a fault. So, the strategy is about winning over the undecided, the ones who might be starting to doubt. They are rapidly realizing they’ve been had, and that the lies they were told are catching up to them.
The advisors know this. They’ve seen the recent electoral shifts, the waning support. They realize that simply blaming the other guy isn’t going to cut it anymore. They understand that a new approach is needed, a shift towards addressing the economic concerns of voters. The question is, can they get through to him?