By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Lauren Chen, a right-wing media personality, was forced to leave the United States in July after her media company, Tenet Media, was exposed as a Russian media front. The company allegedly received illicit funding from a pro-Putin propaganda outlet, leading to Chen losing her work visa. Despite the ongoing federal case against Tenet’s funders, Chen and her husband returned to the U.S. this holiday season. This was made possible by the Trump administration’s intervention, specifically with assistance from State Department official Joe Rittenhouse.
Read the original article here
Trump Admin Scores Visa for Founder of Russian Propaganda Outlet, a scenario that, frankly, shouldn’t surprise anyone anymore. The fact that the Trump administration allegedly facilitated a visa for someone connected to a Russian propaganda outlet seems to be the latest in a long line of actions that raise eyebrows and questions about allegiances. We’re talking about a situation where someone who likely shouldn’t have been allowed back in the country, suddenly gets a golden ticket, thanks to the help of someone with clear ties to the Trump campaign.
This action feels like a direct slap in the face to anyone concerned about foreign interference in American affairs. The immediate question is, why? What could possibly motivate such a move? Some people see it as simple greed, a willingness to sell out the country for personal gain. Others see it as a deliberate effort to assist a foreign power with its influence operations. The reality, as always, is probably some combination of both. It’s hard to ignore the potential for quid pro quo here, the idea that favors are being exchanged.
The timing of this is also noteworthy. This happened at a time when there were increasing concerns about foreign meddling in American elections and the spread of disinformation. This makes the administration’s actions seem even more egregious. It’s as if they were deliberately ignoring the warning signs and, in some cases, actively working against efforts to protect American interests. The fact that this individual was supposedly running an influence operation aimed at reaching American audiences with Russian propaganda is the cherry on top.
The response from the public has been, predictably, one of outrage and disbelief. It’s hard to imagine that this would be accepted without some level of criticism. Many see it as a betrayal of trust, a sign that the administration is not acting in the best interests of the American people. Others see it as a further confirmation of their long-held suspicions about the former president’s ties to Russia.
This whole scenario is a stark reminder of the corrosive effects of money and power on our political system. It highlights the importance of transparency and accountability, and the need for vigilance in protecting our democracy from those who would seek to undermine it. There are valid concerns about the way the US government handles visa applications, and this particular case serves as a perfect example of what can go wrong when political considerations override national security concerns.
It’s easy to dismiss this as just another political spat, but it’s far more serious than that. It’s about the integrity of our electoral process, the very foundation of our democratic institutions. The American people deserve to know the full truth about these events, and those responsible should be held accountable for their actions.
The reactions are a mix of anger, resignation, and a sense of “here we go again.” Some people are so jaded that they’re almost expecting this type of behavior from the former administration. It’s a sad state of affairs when such blatant disregard for ethics and national security is met with a shrug. The responses also range from calling the former president a traitor to more measured critiques.
The incident underscores the urgent need for a thorough investigation, and for those in positions of power to remember who they serve. It also serves as a potent reminder of the importance of an independent press, the only way citizens can remain informed. It’s hard to believe that this isn’t a matter of national security, and we all deserve to know why this happened, who was involved, and what measures are being taken to prevent it from happening again.
The question of whether or not the former president should be considered a traitor is a serious one, and it’s a question that many Americans are grappling with. Regardless of how one feels, the events surrounding the granting of this visa, along with other similar incidents, certainly provide fuel for those who believe he is. This is a complex issue, with many different angles to consider.
Ultimately, this case is not just about a visa. It’s about a bigger, and far more concerning, picture. It’s about the state of our democracy and whether or not it is under threat from both foreign and domestic enemies. It’s about whether or not we’re willing to stand up and fight to protect it.