By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The New York Times published an op-ed by Frank Bruni scrutinizing Donald Trump’s health, prompting the former president to accuse the publication of “seditious, perhaps even treasonous” behavior. Trump’s comments followed his recent appearances, including a rally and cabinet meeting, which have fueled speculation about his health and work schedule. He has also taken issue with reporting on his performance, and falling approval ratings. Trump has also brought attention to recent medical examinations, and his Truth Social post also criticized The New York Times, calling them “the true Enemies of the People,” and the outlet faces an ongoing defamation lawsuit from Trump.
Read the original article here
Trump rages against The New York Times after op-ed questions his health: ‘seditious, perhaps even treasonous” – and honestly, where do we even begin? It seems like every time he opens his mouth, we’re treated to a new level of absurdity. This time, it’s the accusation that questioning his health, as The New York Times did in an op-ed, somehow constitutes treason or sedition. It’s almost comical in its blatant disregard for the truth.
The immediate reaction is, of course, a mixture of disbelief and eye-rolling. The idea that pointing out potential health concerns, especially in a public figure, is a betrayal of the country is, quite frankly, ludicrous. The words “treason” and “sedition” carry significant weight, describing actions that directly threaten the very fabric of a nation. To casually toss them around in response to a critical article is not only inappropriate but also demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of their meaning. It’s like he picked them up in a bargain bin of vocabulary and now feels compelled to use them, regardless of context.
Now, let’s be real. It’s not just about the words themselves; it’s the pattern. This is a man who seemingly considers any criticism an act of war. Anyone who disagrees with him, questions him, or even just points out a factual inaccuracy is immediately labeled an enemy. It’s a tactic designed to silence dissent and intimidate anyone who might dare to speak truth to power. This pattern of behavior is something we’ve seen time and time again.
The irony here is almost too much to bear. This is the same person who, for years, relentlessly questioned the health and mental acuity of his political opponents. Remember the constant jabs at Biden’s age and fitness? Where was the outrage then? The hypocrisy is stunning. It’s like he’s saying, “Rules for thee, but not for me.”
And let’s not forget the context. The op-ed in question likely raised legitimate concerns about his health, a topic that is undoubtedly relevant when discussing someone seeking to lead the country. It’s not just a matter of personal privacy; it’s about the ability to perform the duties of the office. To suggest that such inquiries are treasonous is to fundamentally misunderstand the role of a free press and the importance of holding public figures accountable.
Furthermore, his actions are starting to look like the actions of someone whose grasp on reality is slipping. The constant need to defend himself, the tendency to lash out at anyone who dares to question him, and the increasing use of inflammatory language all point to a disturbing trend. It’s as though he’s trapped in a perpetual state of defensiveness, lashing out at shadows and imagining enemies around every corner.
This whole situation is a perfect illustration of how he operates. It’s about distraction, misdirection, and ultimately, a desperate attempt to control the narrative. By throwing around accusations of treason and sedition, he hopes to shift the focus away from the actual issues and onto a manufactured controversy.
One can’t help but wonder if he even understands what these words mean. It’s as if he learns a new, impressive-sounding word and then tries to cram it into every sentence, regardless of whether it actually fits. Perhaps he should take some time to consult a dictionary, or better yet, a therapist. The country deserves better than this constant barrage of manufactured outrage and baseless accusations. We’ve watched this play out before. Questioning him is treasonous; being questioned is treasonous. It’s tiresome. The only thing that seems clear is that his rhetoric grows more detached from reality with each passing day.