By John Q. Hosedrinker 
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles confirmed that President Donald Trump’s name is in the Epstein files, stating that the late sex offender and Trump were once “young, single playboys together.” Wiles also mentioned that Trump was on Epstein’s plane, the Lolita Express, and that the president is not in the file doing anything awful. The chief of staff offered criticism of Attorney General Pam Bondi’s handling of the Epstein matter. Wiles also denied the authenticity of an alleged birthday letter Trump sent to Epstein, dismissing it as “not his.”
Read the original article here
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ The initial reaction to this statement, and the revelation that Susie Wiles, a figure close to Donald Trump, confirmed his presence in the Epstein files, is a sharp and immediate rejection of the framing. The phrase “young, single playboys” is viewed with extreme skepticism and derision. The immediate objection is that Trump, at the time of his alleged association with Epstein, was neither young nor single. He was in his late 40s or 50s, married with children. The argument emphasizes the age difference between Trump and the victims, and the blatant inaccuracy of the terminology used to describe the situation.
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ The discussion quickly morphs into a condemnation of the euphemistic language used. The term “playboy” is seen as a deliberate attempt to sanitize and downplay the nature of the alleged crimes. The focus shifts to the alleged offenses: child rape and sex trafficking. The consensus is that the language serves to minimize the gravity of the situation and protect the accused. The reaction underscores the deep mistrust and revulsion felt towards any attempt to normalize or excuse such behavior. It is seen as part of a larger pattern of deflection and denial, also referred to as “DARVO” – Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender.
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ The narrative surrounding the Epstein files is perceived as a dangerous attempt to reframe the events. The repeated emphasis on the age of the alleged perpetrators, along with the misleading descriptions, is seen as part of the “boys will be boys” defense. This evokes disgust and outrage, as it trivializes the serious nature of the crimes. The public perception seems to be that they were grown men engaged in horrific behavior with young, vulnerable victims. The attempt to portray it as something less, like innocent “playboy” behavior, is not accepted and instead condemned.
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ Another aspect of the discussion revolves around the potential motivations behind this narrative. There’s a strong belief that this is a deliberate strategy. This strategy is described as trying to lessen the impact of the allegations. It is speculated that this narrative aims to control the damage and create a more favorable public perception for Trump. Some see it as a desperate attempt to defend Trump’s reputation, even if it means distorting the truth.
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ Beyond the semantics, the discussion delves into the potential consequences. The public’s desire to see accountability and a full disclosure of the events is apparent. Some people emphasize the importance of all the information related to the case coming out. This encompasses all the names within the Epstein files. There’s a belief that justice should be served, and the full extent of the alleged crimes should be exposed.
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ The discussion reveals an underlying anger towards the individuals involved. The outrage isn’t just directed at Trump. The anger is also directed at all parties associated with the case. The tone becomes very critical of those who seem to enable or attempt to excuse the behavior. The feeling is that these individuals deserve nothing less than the full weight of the law.
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ Within the responses, there is an acknowledgment of the gravity of the situation. Some note that if Trump is confirmed to be in the files, there is a perception of hypocrisy. His image of “family values” and morality is directly contrasted with the alleged association. The revelation is seen as an affront to these values and a betrayal of the public trust.
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ The focus shifts to the perceived attempts at a cover-up. There is suspicion of an orchestrated effort to protect the powerful, while ensuring that the public does not know the full truth. The discussion reveals distrust of the establishment. The comments reflect a cynical attitude toward those who might be involved in keeping certain details private.
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ The tone is heavily sarcastic when addressing the phrasing. The description “young, single playboys” is criticized as ludicrous. The reality of the situation is emphasized and the term is recognized as absurd. The reaction reveals an unwillingness to accept any justification or explanation.
Susie Wiles confirms Trump is in the Epstein files: They were ‘young, single playboys together.’ The public is weary of such language. The response is to reject such narrative framing. The overall sentiment is that there should be no room for excuses or attempts to sanitize what happened. The public is seeking accountability, not a softening of the truth.