By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During Slate’s Political Gabfest 20th anniversary show, Stephen Colbert was asked about a potential presidential run in 2028 and responded that he should not run. The question arose amid rumors and after Colbert’s history of political satire, including forming an exploratory committee in 2012. Although he has engaged in mock political campaigns in the past, he clarified his decision not to pursue a presidential bid. Colbert, whose tenure on “The Late Show” concludes in 2026, hinted at the possibility of future service to the nation.
Read the original article here
Stephen Colbert Addresses 2028 Presidential Bid Rumors
The question of whether Stephen Colbert might consider a run for the presidency in 2028 is definitely a hot topic, and it’s easy to see why. He’s a well-known figure, a sharp wit, and has a knack for dissecting the political landscape with humor and intelligence. When asked about it, Colbert’s response seemed to fall into the category of a carefully worded non-answer. He technically addressed the rumors, but seemed to intentionally avoid a definitive answer. This kind of ambiguity keeps the speculation alive and kicking, naturally.
The mere thought of a Colbert presidential bid sparks a lot of different reactions. Some people, perhaps tired of the current political status quo, would welcome the idea. They might see him as a breath of fresh air, someone who could bring a fresh perspective and a new approach to governing. There’s a feeling that traditional qualifications and experience might not be as important as they once were, especially when weighing the actions of politicians today. Why not someone with a proven ability to connect with people, someone who can think on their feet, and who has a strong sense of empathy?
On the other hand, there’s a strong sentiment against more celebrity candidates entering the political arena. Many would prefer to see politics become less about entertainment and more about substance. There’s a desire for “boring” leaders, individuals focused on policy and enacting real change rather than seeking the spotlight. Some people might question whether a comedian, no matter how intelligent, could truly handle the immense responsibilities of the presidency. There is concern of the “entertainer” President trope.
The comparisons to Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the comedian-turned-president of Ukraine, are inevitable. Zelenskyy’s success has challenged traditional notions of leadership and demonstrated that non-traditional backgrounds can indeed translate into effective governance. This comparison gives hope for the success of someone like Colbert. It also highlights the argument that the ability to win an election is the ultimate prerequisite.
However, many point out that Colbert’s strengths lie in his role as a commentator. He’s skilled at analyzing politics, but that doesn’t necessarily translate into the ability to lead a country. There are those who believe he is more of a “commentator, not a player.” Some feel he might lack the political experience or the willingness to engage in the necessary political maneuvering.
Some suggest that even if he did run, it might be more of a troll, a way to satirize the system or to make a statement, rather than a genuine attempt to win. There’s a sense that Colbert understands the challenges and the importance of the office, and that he isn’t motivated by personal ambition. The argument is that neither he nor Jon Stewart seems to have a real desire to “grift”.
Others suggest that if Colbert were to enter politics, a Senate run might be a more fitting approach. It would allow him to hone his skills in a legislative environment. It would also give him more experience before potentially considering a presidential bid.
Ultimately, the debate over a potential Colbert run reflects broader questions about the nature of leadership and the role of celebrities in politics. The possibility also exposes the divide of experience and capability in politics, as some suggest that experience is not all that important if there is an ability to win the election.