By the end of 2025, Russia’s irrecoverable losses in the war are projected to reach 1.2 million, a figure unseen since World War II, despite starting the war with approximately 1 million active-duty troops. This represents the effective destruction and rebuilding of the Russian army, now expanded to 1.5 million active personnel. The casualty rate includes those killed and severely wounded, with the proportion of killed soldiers rising annually. Despite these staggering losses and minimal territorial gains, the Kremlin shows no sign of relenting, continuing its strategy of relentless infantry assaults. This echoes the brutal tactics of the Soviet Union during World War II, prioritizing relentless attacks over the value of human life.

Read the original article here

Russia Has Lost 1.2 Million Troops in Ukraine—More Than Its Entire Pre-War Army: This is a staggering claim, one that immediately grabs your attention. The numbers, reportedly coming from sources within Ukraine’s General Staff, paint a grim picture of the conflict. The idea of losing more troops than the entirety of a pre-war army is something that should make anyone pause and consider the sheer scale of the devastation.

The shocking reality, however, is that this kind of staggering loss may not even faze the man orchestrating the war. The consensus seems to be that Russia’s actions are reminiscent of wartime strategies of the past, with a cold disregard for human life. To many, the war is a monumental blunder, a testament to ineptitude and disorganization, but for the one pulling the strings, those piles of dead soldiers may be more like trophies, a grim reflection of his unwavering will and image of a strong leader. It’s a somber truth that the core motivation may be more about ego and control than any tangible territorial gain.

The false promises of a peace deal are easily revealed when the real goals are known. It seems that territory is not the sole objective here; instead, the war itself may be the ultimate goal. The idea is to keep fighting, regardless of the cost, and a peace deal may simply serve as a temporary pause, a chance to regroup before the next onslaught.

The sheer scale of the loss is hard to comprehend. We’re talking about a million-plus casualties, a figure that’s hard to reconcile with the official numbers that are released. It’s a sobering reminder that war is an incredibly destructive force. The constant need for more men, relying on the draftees, convicts, and foreign fighters, underscores the unsustainable nature of the conflict. The existing troops who were experienced are long gone. It is also interesting to note that in a war of this scale Russia has, according to some data, been able to grow its army in Ukraine over the last four years. The numbers are a good reminder of the old saying that the only thing that matters is winning and that it doesn’t matter how many soldiers are needed, they will keep fighting unless they are forced to pull out of the war due to their internal affairs.

The emotional toll of this kind of war is immense. This isn’t just about military strategy; it’s about real people, sent to the front lines with minimal training. These men are seen as nothing more than expendable, thrown into a meat grinder with little regard for their lives or well-being. It’s hard not to be moved by the accounts of those who have seen the horrors firsthand, of the young men who were conscripted and were given a week’s worth of training.

The situation is worsened when you consider the possible future that the troops face if they survive. The loss of a significant portion of their military strength will mean a long period of rebuilding, and a pause in future expansions of their territory. The loss of troops is further complicated by the fact that the army depends on outsiders.

The issue is that Russia does not seem to care about its soldiers, and does not seem to care for the lives that are being lost. There is a general feeling of an acceptance of this passivity. The entire nation is condemned for this. However, it’s also worth acknowledging the varying perspectives, with some sources claiming much lower casualty figures, and reminding us to think carefully before accepting any numbers as gospel truth.

There is a sense of despair and the lack of unrest in Russia. This lack of reaction underscores the deep-seated control exerted by the government, and the potential for a long and bloody conflict. The reality of Putin’s isolation is a key factor, as the information he receives is curated by those he trusts, potentially shielding him from the full extent of the war’s devastation. The thought is that the leader may not even fully grasp the gravity of the situation. This war is the story of Russian empire as a whole, it has always been the same.

Ultimately, the article serves as a stark reminder of the human cost of war. The reported numbers, the strategies employed, and the potential for further conflict all point to a devastating and complex situation that demands our attention and empathy. It is an image of a nation caught in a deadly cycle of violence, where the cost of ambition is measured in the lives of millions.